|
You have reached the Newsletter Archives of the Alpha
Omega Society. To browse through different years, click on
button labeled "Up". To
explore our website click on the button labeled "Home".
If you want to search our website for something in particular, click right
here to be taken to our search page.
|
From the Chair
The Bra
by
Gloria Sue Fenton
I was almost thirteen years old when, through a situation of
circumstances, I had a fateful day in my life. I was home all alone for the day
and had a series of house chores to do which included putting away some laundry.
It had been awhile, actually several months, since I had worn anything feminine,
and it was the farthest thing from my mind as the day started.
I was becoming a young man, though I can’t say I really
knew what that was because being a boy sure had not been easy. But, if boys didn’t
wear women’s things, well then, young men surely didn’t either.
Some of the laundry I had to put away belonged to my mother.
My downfall was opening up that one dresser drawer and seeing those two brand
new bras just lying there. I did try to just close the dresser drawer and walk
away, but just looking at them wouldn’t be a problem. The bras just seemed so
white, and so pretty, and felt so soft to the touch. The tags on them said they
were size 36B. Satisfied, I closed the drawer and walked away.
I hadn’t, by then, worn a bra for over two years, maybe
longer, and I swear it was like those bras were like magnets to me. I convinced
myself that if I could put on one of the bras for just a minute that I could
then walk away and never do it again. Wearing a bra before always meant that I
had to tie the back of it in order to get it to fit me, but this time was
different. As I put one of those brand new bras around my chest, I realized I
could hook the bra, and it would fit me.
Months of purging went right out the window as I knew I could
put on that bra just like a real girl. With straps in place, and the cups padded
nicely, I marveled at seeing my new chest in the dresser mirror. I had no body
hair yet because of my youth, and I knew that my chest, right then, was just
like the chests of the girls who I knew at school when they wore their bras. I
even knew that, supposedly, some of those girls padded their bras, just as I
had, so I was not at all different than some of them. My hearing was very acute,
and I used to overhear lots of conversation without really trying.
I was a goner, and knew I had to have more right then.
Everything fell into place. I found a girdle and garter hooks. I found a pair of
stockings. I found a slip that was also a perfect fit for my body, and even a
dress, a sleeveless black dress, that fit except for being way too long. A
needle and thread, and a very rough hemming solved that problem, though.
It seemed unbelievable to me that so many things were there,
right then, just for me. Even by then, the bra I was wearing, I felt was my bra,
and I just had to put the rest of my clothes on or feel like I was just going to
explode inside me. I put on the girdle, and it felt good to me, though I had
never worn a girdle before. Years before, I had been teased severely by some
other boys for having "girls’ legs" when I wore shorts. I hadn’t
worn a pair of shorts since that time.
As I sat on the edge of the bed, though, and put on my
stockings I was glad I had "girls’ legs". It took awhile to figure
out the garter hooks, and how to fasten them to the top of my stockings, but I
learned. A look in the mirror proved that my chest, my hips, and then my legs
looked and felt so very pretty to me, and I felt so good and happy about it.
My legs were just as pretty as any of the girls I knew, even
prettier than some, and I was very glad my legs were also hairless. I knew young
men got hair on their bodies and legs, but at least it wasn’t a problem then.
I was becoming a girl with everything I put on, and loved it. For so many years,
all I could wear were bits and pieces of clothing, from time to time. That day I
knew I was going to be complete. I put on the slip and then the little black
dress.
The dress contoured to my body as I zipped it up, and it felt
good to see my body fill out that dress in what I had heard said was "all
the right places". My hairless arms looked good in the sleeveless dress, so
pretty, so feminine. My mind was racing to comprehend all that was happening to
me, as I felt myself, and saw myself, changing from a boy to a girl, right
before my eyes. A scary moment came as I sat on the edge of the bed again and
let my stockinged feet slip into a pair of black 2" spike heels. I was sure
they would be too big, but like everything else that day, it was as if those
heels were made just for me.
Just like the other girls I knew, I learned to walk in my
very first pair of heels that day, and I felt even more just like them. I put on
a necklace and earrings, and then faced a really major drawback. My hair was way
too short for a girl. I was so close to making that mirror image a complete
girl, and I felt myself starting to cry because it hurt so much to not feel I
was complete. But the magic of the day wasn’t over yet. I remembered something
I had seen in the attic. Within minutes I was in front of the dresser mirror
again.
I wiped the tears from my eyes and used a hairbrush to comb
some of my hair down over my forehead to make bangs, and then added the black
hat I had remembered, to my head. My boy’s hair disappeared. I started shaking
all over as I sprayed some perfume on my wrists and neck, and it took a lot of
concentration to add my final touch. I was still shaking as I stepped back from
the dresser to see my full image in the dresser mirror. It may have all been in
my mind, but there in the mirror was not just a girl, but a beautiful young
woman looking back at me.
The whole impact of the moment hit me then, very hard. Where
three hours earlier had been a boy looking at a bra in the dresser, there was
now me, as a woman. For years I had dreamed of that moment, and had dreaded it,
too. I had dreamed of a time of putting all the bits and pieces of dressing up
together, just to know how it would look and feel. But that time had scared me,
too, because it was always there in my mind that I was a boy, and I was not
supposed to have the thoughts and feelings I did inside me. Right then, I was
facing that moment.
I had never expected to feel the physical, mental, and
emotional sensations that I was experiencing. These were not the sensations of a
boy, and I knew that very well. I had never felt as good, as real, and as
complete, and I felt right then, in all my life, and surely never as a boy. I
didn’t have a clue what was happening to me. Way back in my mind something
told me I was doing something wrong, and that I should hate myself and be
ashamed, because I was a boy. But I didn’t.
There was no boy in that bedroom, and I didn’t feel ashamed
of that. Maybe later I would, I thought to myself. But that would be later. For
whatever reason I had become real, just as real as the boy, and I needed to live
and breathe just as he did. I went about the rest of my chores that day, feeling
happy and good. But, as they say, all good things come to an end, and later that
afternoon I knew I had to let Martin, the boy, return.
I saw him return as I wiped off my lipstick and began
undressing and putting everything back where it belonged. I don’t know why it
happened or how it happened, but that day I was born and the war between him and
I began. It took twenty-five years for us to find peace with each other. And I
can tell you that there were many times in those years of war that we both
returned in our minds to that one day when he found a brand new bra in a dresser
drawer, and it fit me.
Maybe it would all have happened anyway, at another time. We
don’t know and never will. How could a bra start a war? Well, now you know. g
Return to
Contents
|
|
Bits
& Pieces - Diane Frank
Bits & Pieces – By Diane Frank
It only figures that once I write about the Sam Walls affair,
I have something curious happen. A fellow at work says, "I
thought I saw you in a group photo." That’s innocuous enough, and
I replied I couldn’t imagine where, as I hadn’t had that many occasions to
be in group photos and I personally tried to keep my visibility on the web to a
minimum. To which he responded, "I can’t remember,
but did you see the guy selling the wedding dress on the web?"
It seems that a guy who’d like to be thought of as funny
sold his ex-wife’s wedding dress on eBay, and posed in it to model the thing.
It did hit the national press, and eBay allowed him to keep an extra long
journal on the sale.
Here’s a sampling of links to the publicity he’s received:
(Addressable via computer from the Word and web versions, but not the PDF or
printed versions - Ed)
Seattle Man
Finds Fame By Wearing Wedding Dress For eBay Photo
KIROtv.com, WA
Wedding
Dress Guy Took Liberties In eBay Ad
KMGH, Denver
Man
who sold ex's wedding dress on eBay earns instant fame
USA Today
Ex-husband
models wedding dress on eBay
Corvallis Gazette Times
Man
Models, Sells Ex-Wife's Wedding Dress
FOX News - Apr 29, 2004
Gauthier:
Wedding blues turn green
Framingham Metro West Daily News,
MA - Apr 29, 2004
Aisle take
my revenge
The Sun, UK
Fatman
puts wedding dress up for sale on Ebay
The Inquirer, UK - Apr 28,
2004
Got
Plans?
Washington Post - Apr 1,
2004
And if you want to see the original, here’s the URL:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4146756343&category=63851&sspagename=rvi:1:1
And it isn’t even the silly season yet.
Diane
Return to
Contents
|
|
Feminism and
Femininity: A Seminar
By Diane Frank
According to Case’s Professor Reneé Sentilles., citing a
Thomas LeClerc’s "Making Sex", there used to be only one sex and two
genders. Females were viewed as imperfect males, rather than as a class distinct
unto themselves. That there were differences in behavior of imperfect males was
only natural, a function of their failed physiologies. Only during the so-called
"Enlightenment" did we come to view things in a totally binary form,
creating a wall of separation of between male and female and tattooing lists of
permanent attributes to each class on the bodies of infants as they were born.
This fascinating revelation was part of her ongoing research
into the origins of the term "tomboy", which Professor Sentilles has
learned, originally meant both rowdy men and bawdy women. Only in recent times
has tomboy come to mean a female acting in a "mannish" or
"boyish" way. And while in years past, most women would be highly
offended to be considered tomboys, most women today would have little trouble if
that appellation were applied to them. But along with the relegation of tomboy
to boyish girls, came another forced gender distinction: women as sexually
passive. Back in the days when there was only one sex, women were viewed as
sexual predators. They used their wiles to slake their lust by seducing men to
their downfall, just as Eve did with Adam. This change coincided with a change
in the ideal body chosen for painting from that of a pubescent male to a woman’s
body. (I think this is a current thesis posed by arch-feminist provocateur
Germaine Greer in "The Beautiful Boy"...but I’ve got catching up to
do... now where did I leave my Cliff Notes?)
These concepts and more were just part of the discussion at
an informal seminar on feminism and femininity held at Lake Erie College in
Painesville, earlier this month. Curated by my friend from last year’s
Cleveland International film festival, Lyz Bly, the art gallery is currently
showing the works of two strongly feminist women artists, among other offerings.
Some of the photographs of Sarah Curry were pictures of women friends in poses
and with captions that commented on the struggle women have in defining their
lives for themselves. Ms. Curry, calling herself a voyeur also used a downward
looking viewfinder to take candid images of people as she explored the
rockabilly culture around her. One thing she observed was that men look at women
the way they look at cars.
Hadley K. Conner used vividly colored, near-realistic
paintings with overlays to make similar comments. The overlays of plastic stood
off from parts of the painting by about a foot and contained line drawings based
on commercial art that views women as sex objects. The line art cast a shadow on
the painting, forcing the observer to consider the imposition of sexual
expectations on women. The overlays were also presented as being symbolic of
veils worn by women at weddings, and in ancient times again at their funerals.
Ms. Prudic, another panel member and Art Professor at Lake
Erie, discussed her current series of creations. Text is written on moldings
(skins) made of her body. Starting from a concern about banned books and freedom
of expression, Ms. Prudic received a deliberately offensive remark that after
insulting gay women and African-American men asked, "NOW do you believe in
free speech." She chose to render the offensive remark along with the less
pointed commentary because of her commitment to free speech, but she also sensed
and discussed the conflict that this was intended to and did create.
In the discussion one of the artists also said, "high
heels and liquid eye-liner were invented by men, but... I like high heels and
liquid eye-liner." This comment was recognized as articulating the problem
faced by third generation feminists- in one sense having their cake and eating
it too. The notion that women are people too, and have may have dreams of
fulfillment beyond, outside or instead of wifedom and motherhood and are
entitled to pursue these as a basic human right is to the present generation of
young women established, at least in the west. Equal pay for the same job, if
not equal pay for equivalent work is also regarded as an established principle.
At the same time, the idea that feminism requires giving up heels and eye-liner
seems to strike these women as similar to Emma Goldman’s statement: "If I
can't dance, I don't want to be a part of your revolution!"
So where do eye-liner and high heels fit into this? In part
that’s why I attended the seminar. One of the largest areas that crossdressers
stumble over time and again is "what do I wear and what does it mean?"
Which of course means individual wrestling with the question of what does it
mean to express the fabled "feminine side" or "inner woman."
There is one stream of feminist discourse that decries the
choices crossdressers make. By dressing like their mothers (the Tri-Ess
stereotype of a conservative man in a conservative dress as exemplified by the
pictures alleged to be ex-Tri-Ess treasurer Samantha Walls) or as whores,
crossdressers are men engaged in a ritual reinforcement of immoral cultural
impositions on women. When coupled with complaints by some of the less aware CDs
that women don’t know how to be feminine anymore, this radical analysis has a
lot of sense to it. Those were the kinds of things forming questions for me
attending this event.
I can’t claim to have found any answers that can be passed
on to anyone else. I had some fascinating conversations with women afterwards,
and was invited to a gallery opening which that I was unable to attend. I was
also invited to contribute to "Cool Cleveland," as I happened to be
sitting next to a woman who is an editor for the on-line journal. For the moment
I have declined, in part because I think some of the things I think and believe
are critical of aspects of the behavior and thinking of members of the so-called
transgender community. I’d prefer my remarks to be stimulus for discussion
inside the community rather than outside. g
Return
to Contents
|
|
Picture This!
By Diane Frank
One of the areas where Alpha Omega stands apart from the
majority of crossdressing support organizations is our avoidance of pictures on
our website, in our newsletter and even in the conduct of our meetings. During
the last month our website was bombarded by people seeking information about a
"Samantha Walls", a former Tri-Ess national officer whose name had
appeared in several AO newsletters in the routine course of business. Later,
pictures alleged to be the same person emerged as during the primary campaign of
Sam Walls.
Mr. Walls, a political candidate in an ultra-ultra-conservative region of the
ultra-conservative state of Texas was alleged to be this former Tri-Ess officer.
There are several instructive aspects to this farce. Here is
evidence yet again that newspaper reporters can be trusted to get parts of a
story wrong. In the early reports the person in question was said to be an
officer of AO, despite the clearly written statements that referred to Tri-Ess.
Did the reporters contact AO for information? No! Did the reporters respond on a
timely basis to email with the correct information? No. Was a correction
printed? No. The only redemption here is that later stories did place the
connection properly with Tri-Ess.
The second part of this is a lead article in which a Houston
transgender activist chooses to confirm (truthfully or not) all elements of the
story when asked by a reporter. One of the supposed rules of Tri-Ess meetings,
gender conventions, etc., and a real
rule within Alpha Omega is the one about confidentiality. We don’t
"out" people. If we make friends and come to know personal
information, we do not share it. But this particular transgender activist did.
What does this tell us about trusting people in meetings or conventions? What
does this suggest about the agendas and trustworthiness of activists? I’m sure
we all know that there are activists who believe everyone should be out. Can you
trust them not to "out" you when it gets their name in the paper?
The third part of this is, of course, about the pictures. If
you’re going to leave "incriminating" pictures lying around in your
rented trailer, for heaven’s sakes clean them out before someone forecloses on
it. Or keep up the payments. And if you’re going to keep pictures, let them be
good ones! Smile! The alleged "pictures of the candidate" they ran
down in Texas would have been vastly improved by a smile. All those sober
pictures only send a message to people that you’ve been caught doing something
"wrong."
Okay, seriously, what is it with this picture mania anyhow?
And why-oh-why do people post them on the internet, where they can be passed
around like trading cards? Unless you’re out, or willing to be out, all you do
with these collections of pictures is leave a trail for the bigots or
opportunists. Nice friendly people who would prevent you from running for public
office, holding a job or even keeping the respect of friends and family until
you "come out" at a time of your own choosing.
Then there’s this little tidbit
In the newest aftershock, we learn that Walls not only has
worn a dress but has also appeared as "Samantha Walls" with a
Houston-based club of other men who like to dress up. This was three years ago,
not 15 or 20, and Samantha has publicly
posted Web messages as recently as May 15.
In this quote from the Dallas-Fort
Worth Star-Telegram’s columnist Bud
Kennedy are revealed a number of things that are not fun. I’ll bet that the
person in question didn’t think that the web messages were public at all. But,
after all, what is private on the web? Your every e-mail can be tracked back to
you with a routine subpoena. So-called ‘private’ chat groups or list-serves
can have moles in them. Anyone can record a chat session, and unlike recording a
phone conversation, they have no legal obligation to inform you that it’s
being recorded.
One thing you can’t do anything about is someone else using
your email address. For example, in many guestbooks, you can leave an email
address. I did a Google search on my email address. Back in 2001, one Daniel
Frank left a message in the Pyramid Lake Paiute Guestbook, and left my email
address, probably just a few keystrokes away from his. I guess this is why,
while the papers reported that Samantha Walls email address had been used, they
didn’t report where. Let’s just say the site wasn’t a crossdressing site,
but it also wasn’t consistent with the claims of conservative family values
that Mr. Walls was running under. Whether Mr. Walls actually posted a private
message that only showed the email address can’t readily be determined.
This brings me to my next point: Web correspondence brings
out the worst in us. I’ve flamed people and I’ve been flamed. I’ve written
some things that I’m embarrassed about now. Slowly over the decades (yes it’s
been that long), I learned better (still don’t claim to be perfect!), but the
supposed anonymity of the web is an incitement and enticement to forgo the norms
of civil conversation.
But it’s not only the flames that can be a problem, even
the cordial content can be problematic. Consider that many CD messages are
written in a syrupy sweet, faux-femme style that would make the hardiest romance
writer collapse in a diabetic coma. Suppose the candidate signed some of those
missives with "hugggs", "Hun", "Huggerz", or
"XXXX", or talked about getting together with the "girlz",
or an increasingly dangerous and risque list of other things I’m sure we’ve
all seen.
Over the past few presidential administrations we’ve
watched a game of people leaving the White House and turning out kiss and tell
memoirs. While some of this is whistle-blowing and all to the good, if the
President of the US can’t have some room for privacy what makes any of us
think that we can expect it? I’ve believed for a long time that the only
reason that there is the semblance of privacy on the net is that it has become
so large as to create substantial barriers to snooping… but substantial isn’t
perfect.
As a last point, there are our old friends at Tri-Ess. They’re
in a pretty pickle over this. What you might expect them to do...to say is,
"Hey, look here, Sam(antha) Walls was our treasurer and brought the same
unquestionable integrity to that job that you can expect from him as a
legislator. We know better than anyone else that his wearing skirts from time to
time did not impair his judgment, honesty and leadership. We’re glad he was a
member, we’re sorry to see him go, and if the good voters of Swampwater Texas
don’t vote him into office it’s their loss."
On the other hand, they might all be quaking in their
six-inch heels that this will "out" more of them, expose the whole
Texas cross-dressed heterosexual conservative "normal" good ol’boys
club to public scrutiny. They might figure that they’ll do Sam more harm than
good speaking up as an organization. They could figure that they really can’t
do anything because of confidentiality rules. They could have issued a statement
saying that due to confidentiality rules they can’t comment about people’s
identities, and then use the attention to educate. No evidence of that. Better
just keep quiet, the way they always do. No right answers for that group here,
only a succession of bad choices or worse ones. g
Return
to Contents
|
A CD Eye For Art
This recent New
Yorker cover is totally unrelated to the eBay antics, but still apropos -
Elaine
|
 |
Member Dues
April is the month to pay your annual dues:
$36 Single
$48 Couple
Return to
Contents
|
|
|
|
Upcoming
Meetings
Upcoming Meetings
April- Canceled Due to
conflicts with Easter
May - Chinese Food
June- Reki and Tai-Chi
(and
Maybe an Image
Consultant...but not
making any promises)
Return to
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return to
Contents
|
Audio
is Live on Our Website
As our way of letting
people know who we are, by sharing our conversations and ideas
instead of our pictures we’ve now posted streaming audio of
two of our meetings...as well as a few other interesting
items.
So far there have been very few hits on this, tending to
confirm my darker suspicions about what people are really
hoping to find when they visit our site.
If you have been trying to use the audio features and can't
get them to work, please click on the little green dots with
the white figure in the center. That's what get's things
to play. NOT an interface I would have designed...but so it
goes.
Diane
Return to
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publication
Notice and
Club Policies
This
newsletter is
copyright
1998-2003 by
The Alpha
Omega Society. All
right
reserved.
Articles and
information
contained in
this
newsletter may
NOT be without
advance
permission
from the
individual
author. Write
to editor@aosoc.org
in order to
contact the
author. When
permission is
granted, a
copy of the
issue
containing the
reprinted
material must
be sent to
Alpha Omega
within two
months after
the material
is published
and proper
credit is
given to
author and
source.
The
opinions or
statements
contained in
this
newsletter are
those of the
authors and do
not
necessarily
reflect the
views of Alpha
Omega.
Contributions
of articles
are welcomed,
but may be
altered in the
editing
process, with
the author’s
intent
retained, or
may be
rejected,
whether
solicited or
not.
Absolutely no
sexually
explicit
material may
be accepted or
printed.
Alpha Omega
is a
non-profit
social support
group for
heterosexual
crossdressers
and their
wives or
partners.
Also, members
from related
organizations,
helping
professionals,
and approved
guests are
welcome when
cleared
through Alpha
Omega’s
officers.
Meetings
are the second
Saturday
evening of
each month
unless a
special event
is scheduled
that takes the
place of the
regularly scheduled
meeting. The
location of
the meeting or
event is only
released to
members or
others with
the approval
of an officer.
Members and visitors
must be 18
years of age
or older. We
will exchange
newsletters
with any other
similar group.
Send all
correspondence
to Alpha
Omega, P.O.
Box 2053,
Sheffield
Lake, OH
44054.
Return to
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|