|
CONSTRUCTION OF SEX, GENDER, &
SEXUALITY: A LOOK AT THE
LIVES OF MALE
transvestiteS A thesis submitted
in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Arts in Sociology at
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara by
Diane Kholos Wysocki wysockid@unk.edu
Committee in charge:
Professor Denise Bielby, Chair Professor Beth Schneider
Professor Harvey Molotch Professor Kenneth Plummer
Copyright
Notice: Please Read
© 1996, Diane Kholos Wysocki. All materials here may be used
for academic purposes only. I do not ask that you obtain permission before
quoting from any of my work, however the use of the material for any other
reason other than academic research is allowed only with my expressed permission
which is obtainable by email. If you cite this work, please send me a copy
via wysockid@unk.edu.
Proper Citation Citations
of this work for academic purpose should use the following standard form:
Wysocki, D. K.
1992. Construction of Sex, Gender,
& Sexuality: A Look at the Lives of Male transvestites.
Unpublished master's thesis,
University
of
California
,
Santa Barbara
(Sociology)
Use Notice: Please
Read
Professor Wysocki has granted permission to the Alpha Omega Society to host this
material until such time as she withdraws permission. In no way does the
grant of hosting permission to the Alpha Omega Society alter the Copyright
notice above or transfer or imply the transfer of any rights to this material to
any other party.
Table of Contents
Dedication and Acknowledgments
Abstract
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Chapter 3: Theoretical Framework
Chapter 4: Transvestism: Literature Review
Chapter 5: Methodology
Chapter 6: Results The Life of a
Male transvestite
Chapter 7: Discussion and Conclusions
Chapter 8: Bibliography
Diane
Kholos Wysocki's Home Pages
Dedication and Acknowledgments
This Master's thesis is dedicated to my best friend, my husband,
George Arthur Wysocki Without his encouragement,
his willingness to live separately while continuing to work in another state,
and to totally share the responsibilities of our children, I do not believe I
would have gotten this far. Thank you for being there for me and for being
willing to embark on a new lifestyle and also being willing to change your ideas
about what a marriage really is. It has taken courage on your part to
be willing to do something "different."
There are a few people that were very important to the completion of this
paper.
Dr. Denise Bielby, my chair. Denise spent many hours on this
paper with me. She made time for me once a week for a long as I needed
talking with me about ideas, helping me over rough parts, rewriting and more
rewriting. She was available for long distance phone calls from wherever I
happened to be to talk me through a problem and was there for whatever I needed.
Thank you for taking being my chair so seriously. I learned a lot on many
levels.
Dr. Beth Schneider, for being the one who first suggested a MA on
transvestites. Way at the beginning while doing a paper for another class,
Beth encouraged me to not waste time doing two different projects and to turn my
work on transvestism into my MA. She has given me valuable comments
throughout the projects.
Dr. Ken Plummer, who has done quite a bit of work in the area of cross
dressing. I am glad he was visiting UCSB during the year of my project and
willing to be part of it. His knowledge of the transvestism literature was
priceless and his summaries of books he thought I could use were an added plus.
Dr. Harvey Molotch. We didn't spend much time talking about this
project, but I had fun talking about it with him. He was so helpful. His
excitement about the project and his encouragement in future possible
publications is truly appreciated.
And finally, to all my respondents. I could not have completed this
project without their willingness to give of themselves so completely.
Thank you.
Abstract
Three areas of individual identity - sex, gender, and sexuality
- are used to study how transvestic males manage their lives. By using men
who impersonate women on a temporary basis, new avenues are opened into how
these categories are overlapped, blended, recombined, and managed. The
data collection was accomplished in three ways: 1) a two part questionnaire 2)
interviews 3) computer bulletin boards. One hundred and twenty two
subjects answered the demographic information which indicates that the majority
of the subjects are in their 40's, married with children, are white, Christian,
have completed college or higher, hold professional jobs such as engineers,
scientists, and public health administrators, and claim to be heterosexual.
Although the majority state they have told their wives or girlfriends of their
cross dressing, most wives or girlfriends do not react favorably.
In order to understand what parts of masculinity
these men reject and how they manage cross dressing within their day to day male
roles, the population used for the 2nd part of the study were only men who
stated they were currently married and heterosexual, which resulted in 33
subjects being used for this part of the analysis.
Findings suggest that the men in this study believe
that gender roles are dichotomous and that they have no freedom to express any
traits that they believe are feminine within the confines of their masculine
role. Yet, it becomes problematic because most of the men in this sample
did not have a clear idea of what being a women really involves and therefore
portray their feminine side often times as hyper feminine; passive, emotional,
quiet, submissive, and sexual. Similarly, the majority of men have no desire to
change their sex, which might indicate their need to "play" at being a
women while retaining the privilege of being a male.
Chapter 1: Introduction
"The Discovery is, of course, that
"man"
and "women" are fiction, caricatures,
cultural constructs."
Andrea Dworkin 1974
Three areas of an
individual's identity - sex, gender, and sexuality -
will be studied within the framework of this paper. I will look at
heterosexual males, who choose to exhibit the gender of the opposite sex - men
who consider themselves transvestites - to see how they manage their lives.
I believe that by using men who impersonate themselves as women on a temporary
basis will open new avenues into how the categories; sex, gender, and
sexuality are overlapped, blended, recombined, and managed.
Gagnon (personal interview 5/92)
states that, for transvestites, the roles of the biological female, quite
simply, can be divided into two parts, "women's work" and "sex
work." "Women's work" includes the day to day
duties of cooking, cleaning, and caretaking, which seem to be of little
interest to transvestites. "Sex work" in contrast, includes
the more subtle aspects of femaleness; such as the "femininity" of
being a subordinate, putting on make up, wearing high heeled shoes, and being
more emotionally open. This is the aspect of being a woman that seems to
be of most interest to transvestites.
Society strongly encourages men
to converge their masculine identity is such a way that they must adhere to
very strict guidelines of masculinity. However, since transvestites are
different because they choose to display what they describe as a
"feminine" aspect of their personality, management of their two
gender choices becomes an important issue and one that I believe must be
investigated. By studying males who state they are a transvestites, yet
who retain the privilege of being males in this society, I hope to determine
1) what aspects of being a woman are borrowed, found pleasurable, and
therefore portrayed, and 2) what parts of masculinity are retained while
others are rejected.
Given the degree to
which sex, gender, and sexuality are constructed within this society, the
purpose of this project is to:
1) investigate what male transvestites are
rejecting about masculinity and to find out how they reconfigure their gender
identity;
2) to see how transvestism is managed within their
day to day life;
3) to see how the need to manage and hide their
transvestism affects their self identity and self esteem.
Chapter 2: Literature Review
"One is not born, but rather
becomes a Women"
Simone de Beauvoir
Sex is understood to be a continuum of "ascribed biological features of
chromosomes, gonads, and hormones" that fit into categories of either
male or female (Lorber & Farrell, 1991:7). Sometimes, an individual
will not fall into one of the two categories (Lorber & Farrel, 1991), but
instead is born with genitals that are neither or both female or male. It has
been estimated that this condition, called hermaphrodite or intersex, occurs
in only a few people, yet often enough to have been researched (de Savitsch,
1958; Martin & Vorhies, 1975; Talamini, 1982; Nanda, 1990). In other
societies, intersexed individuals live full productive lives within their
communities, as is the cases of the Sererr of Kenya (Martin & Vorhies,
1975), the Hijras of India (Nanda, 1990), and the Nadle of the Navajos (Martin
& Vorhies, 1975). However, within our society it is unacceptable for
a child to not fit physically into one of the two sex categories.
Therefore, medical intervention is frequently performed to rectify the
situation, usually as a result of parents and physicians who are unable to
deal emotionally with a "genderless" child (Kessler, 1990).
While
sex is the biological component of an individual, gender is the "cultural
aspect of the differences between men and women" (Edwards, 1989:1).
Individuals learn, recognize, and reproduce masculine and feminine traits that
are displayed through interactions with each other (West & Zimmerman,
1991:17), giving "gender appearance the key factor in social
communication" (Woodhouse, 1989:7). Based on Kessler &
McKenna`s (1978) theory of gender construction, "gender attribution is a
developmental process in which children learn culturally variable rules for
categorizing by gender," which by approximately age of four or five (Laws
& Schwartz, 1977), becomes "fixed, unvarying, and static" (West
& Zimmerman, 1991:13). In fact, Chodorow states (1989:168) that
"gender is built right into our heads and divides the world into females
and males."
Sometimes the sex category, male or female, does not correspond with the
gender portrayed (Garfinkel, 1967), masculine or feminine, but instead are
conflicting (Thio, 1992). In some societies crossing over the gender
lines of masculine and feminine are not always seen as something negative,
such as the Berdache Indians (Williams, 1992). However, in our society
it is often seen quite negatively and causes conflict for the individual with
peers, siblings, and parents (Green, 1987).
Traditionally sexuality has been explained by three paradigms - instinct,
drive, and energy - that assume that sexuality equals
heterosexuality, making heterosexuality the norm (Fergunson, 1989).
Similarly, popular sexologists such as Havelock Ellis, Kinsey, and Masters and
Johnson have constructed a model of sexuality that "reflects and
reproduces male supremacy which then becomes seen as natural and
universal", making "normal" male sexuality based upon control
over women (Coveney, Jackson, Jeffreys, Kay, & Mahony, 1984:11).
In
contrast many researchers (e.g. Rich, 1983; Weeks, 1986; Green, 1987; Baldwin
& Baldwin, 1989; Vance, 1989) believe sexuality is socially
constructed. Jeffery Weeks (1986) in The Invention of Sexuality states
that:
We must learn to see that sexuality is something
which society produces in complex ways. It is a result of diverse social
practices that give meaning to human activities, of social definitions and
self-definitions, of struggles between those who have power to define and
regulate, and those who resist. Sexuality is not given, it is a product
of negotiation, struggle and human agency (Weeks, 1986:25).
While many
individuals are taught from childhood that the only acceptable sexual
preference is heterosexuality, then one might question how men who sometimes
choose to be "woman" view and enact their sexuality and how it
becomes constructed. By studying the social construction of sexuality we
might determine if transvestism gives these a way of acting on homosexual
tendencies under the guise of heterosexuality and therefore enabling them to
perceived as acceptable?
An essential
aspect of the social construction of sexuality is sexual identity.
Sexual identity, the categories individuals use to locate themselves in
relation to others (Michener, DeLamater, & Schwartz, 1990) begins to
emerge, typically with the onset of puberty (Gagnon & Simon, 1973).
This emerging identity evolves around the individual's attempt to go along
with sexual scripts that are made available to them (Laws & Schwartz,
1977; Simon & Gagnon, 1984; Doctor, 1988). Laws & Schwartz
(1977:2) describe sexual scripts as "repertoire of acts and status's that
are recognized by a social groups, together with the rules, expectations, and
sanctions governing these acts and status's." Similarly, Gagnon &
Simon (1973:19) state that "without the proper elements of a script that
defines the situation, names the actors, and plots the behavior, nothing
sexual is likely to happen." Scripts are a way of anticipating how
behavior comes to be enacted (Simon & Gagnon, 1984). Sexual scripts occur
on 3 levels - cultural, interpersonal, and intrapshyic - and
are available for most interactions among people, such as courtship, romantic
love, flings, serious relationships, orgasms, marriage, cohabitation, and even
swinging (Laws & Schwartz, 1977).
Males and females
learn very different scripts as they grow up. By puberty, scripts for
both sexes become "emphatically heterosexual and oriented towards
marriage" (Laws & Schwartz, 1977:39), and differentiated by sex in
their gender enactment of sexuality. Scripts are learned from peers,
movies, books, and magazines, in preparation for an individual to act within
the dominant sexual scripts of society. Although there are alternative
sexual scripts such as, sadism, masochism, swinging, or transvestism, often
times the individual is unaware of them (Laws & Schwartz, 1977).
Given this conceptual framework, we might expect the study of male
heterosexual transvestites will reveal how individuals manage challenging the
rigid scripts that society sets up for sex, gender, and sexuality.
Moreover, by focusing on the recombination of identities associated with sex,
gender, and sexuality, we will see how individuals mange that repackaging.
Although some societies have no difficulties accepting men whose gender is
different from their biological sex and who are not heterosexual (Martin &
Vorhies, 1975; Nanda, 1990) this society does. Because the
"norm" in our society views sex, gender, and sexuality as completely
overlapping and dichotomous, investigating males who choose to
"play" at being another gender, while not changing their sex, makes
it possible to evaluate which elements of scripts for sex, gender and
sexuality that transvestites choose to retain, which they defy, and why.
Chapter 3: Theoretical Framework
Given the total overlap of sex,
gender, and sexuality in our society and the rigidity with which those
categories are managed, variations on those overlaps are regarded as deviant.
Society often demands that all of those categories must converge perfectly and
when they don't, as in the case of transvestities, they are violating the
"norms" of society. That, in itself, makes transvestites
"different", stigmatized, and needing to manage their dual identities
as a "deviant". Therefore the framework in which this study
informs the identity and managment of transvestism is deviance.
Deviance is most often defined
as any action or behavior that violates or deviates from social norms (Fournet,
Forsyth, & Schramm, 1988; Thio, 1992) and is used as a way of drawing
boundaries between legitimate and illegitimate practices (Cloward & Ohlin,
1960). Kelly (1989) suggests that the study of deviance can be looked at
from seven perspectives , however, for this paper I will look at the
interactionist approach to becoming deviant. This approach focuses on
individuals, how deviant identity is developed while being managed through the
deviant career, and how society plays a part in the stigma associated with
considering oneself deviant.
Studies by Becker (1963) Adler &
Adler (1983) and others show the transition of identity into deviant
status. Adler & Adler (1983) analyzed the career paths of drug
smugglers to outline the process of becoming deviant. They found that drug
dealers went through three levels or stages of increased involvement with the
deviant activity; low-level entry drug dealers, followed by middle level entry
drug dealers, then on to smugglers. Many oscillate in and out of the
drug trafficking, yet few, if any were successful in completely leaving the
activity.
Similarly, Becker's (1963) study on
"marijuana users" emphasized the sequential model of deviant identity
and the development of a deviant career. This model views deviance of an
individual as: "a sequence of movements from one position to another in an
occupational system made by any individual who works in that system "
(Becker, 1963:24).
This model takes into account that behavior
develops in orderly sequence that carries an individual into deviant identity.
The individual must first behave in some way that is considered nonconforming.
This act does not necessarily have to be consciously motivated, and often is
done by someone who has no intention of committing the act, as in the case of
Becker's marijuana "beginner" user. In the second step, the
individual is considered an "occasional" user, where use is sporadic
and dependent on chance factors such as availability, secrecy, and/or fear of
punishment from family, friends or employer. In the final step in the
deviant career becomes a "regular" user. This often
includes involvement in an organized deviant group. Participation in a
subculture and minimal contact with nonusers is necessary to keep the deviant
behavior secret.
For a deviant behavior to continue, the
individual must find ways to neutralize or distance themselves from the negative
aspects of their careers (Levi, 1989). For instance, Levi found that
professional hit man were able to avoid a deviant ascription if the killer had
the ability to detach or reframe from the killing. Similarly, Hong &
Duff (1989) investigated the neutralization process of taxi dancers, women who
danced with men for money, to see how they cope with the unpleasantness of their
job. Findings indicate that if a taxi dancer remained after the first week
of work, she was likely to develop relationships with other dancers.
Through them she learned neutralization techniques which could teach the novice
various denial techniques, usually in the second and third weeks of work.
By the forth week the taxi dancer needed few neutralization techniques and
developed a positive response to the job.
Labeling theorists (Kitsuse, 1962;
Becker, 1963) have found that most deviants are not solitary, but develop
friendships within their social world, called subcultures, that have rules and
regulations similar to the society at large (Millman & Kanter, 1975:260).
Subcultures, either large or small, successfully detach the deviant group from
the larger society. Groups communicate with each other, have at least one
shared goal, and have specific expectations. Group members develop a
concept of themselves as part of a group which sometimes becomes central to
their personal identities (Michener, DeLamater, Schwartz, & Merton, 1990).
These identities are often stable and long lasting (Becker, 1963).
Individuals who are members of
a subculture develop "complicated historical, legal, and psychological
justification for their deviant activity" and have "self justifying
rationales... that furnish individuals with reasons that appear sound for
continuing the line of activity he has begun" (Becker, 1963:38)
People within the group have their deviant activity in common, where the entire
subculture is organized around the particular deviant activity. That
organized activity increases the opportunity to interact with others who have
similar interests (Laws & Schwartz, 1977). Associating with others who
share one's interests has a powerful impact on legitimizing one's activity and
interests to one self.
Schur (1984:22) believes that
"deviance is a matter of definition .... and is in the eye of the
beholder." Therefore, as the individual behavior increases to master status
(Becker, 1963), societal reactions shift from deviant individual behavior, to
the individual personally being deviant, with all of the individual's behaviors
being viewed as something suspect (Tannebaum, 1975). Once the deviant
status of the individual has been established, reactions from society to the
type of category label is applied to the individual. Anyone showing traits
of that category is also labeled. However, it is not the behavior that
causes one to be labeled as deviant, but the responses of others who interpret
and identify the behavior as deviant (Kitsuse, 1962; Plummer, 1981).
Similarly, Klapp (1987) refers to self-typing as the way in which an individual
sees themselves through the eyes of others, which means we depend on the
responses of others in order to see ourselves. The reaction of others to a
behavior depends on the characteristics of the actor, the characteristics of the
audience, and the situational characteristics (Michener, De Lamater, Schwartz,
& Merton, 1990:536).
Once an individual is labeled
as a deviant, the decision to conceal the behavior often occurs. For
example, Edgerton (1967) found that in order to pass as normal, mental patients
must appear to others in society and to themselves as competent. Being
labeled as different or "deviant" is found to lower self esteem.
It is also humiliating and frustrating to the point that the "life of the
person so labeled is scarcely worth living" (Edgerton, 1967:145).
Edgerton found that his subjects "passed" by denying they had been
hospitalized, passing as "normal", by getting a job, and finding a
"normal" mate.
I believe that by using the
interactionist perspective in this study I will show the process that
transvestites go through affects how they perceive themselves as deviant and
manage their sexual preference in that context. I want to explore how they
are reacted to by others, why transvestites often go into groups where
transvestism is the central theme, and how they "pass" in their
day-to-day male roles.
Chapter 4: Transvestism in the Literature
"Femininity is like a garment one puts on
in order to create false impressions"
Laws & Schwartz, 1977
The Chevalier d' Eon de
Beaumont, who was born in 1728, was one of the first documented case of a boy
who dressed as a girl during childhood (de Savitsch, 1958; Thompson, 1974).
Ellis (1928:2) states "he was powerful and intellectual, rather than
feminine, but his virility was all in his brain." In 1895, a
professor of Psychology at Cornell University, Austin Flint, investigated and
photographed a young man who wore feminine clothing and had a very high voice
and called this "disorder" eunuchoidism. Then in 1919, Dr.
Mangus Hirshchfeld, a German sexologist, introduced the word transvestism. The
word "trans" meaning across and "vestism" meaning clothing,
indicated the desire to dress in the clothing of the opposite sex, hence cross
dressing (Benjamin, 1977; Rosen, 1979; Talamini, 1982).
Because there is a great deal
of confusion in the scholarly literature about the various degrees of
transvestism (Sagarin, 1965; Benjamin, 1966; Doctor, 1988; Feinbloom, 1978;
Newton, 1979, Talamini, 1982; Woodhouse, 1989), prior to proceeding any further
it is necessary to define key terms that will be used throughout this paper.
A transvestite is anyone who wears clothing of the opposite sex (Feinbloom,
1976; Doctor, 1988). It is quite common to see women cross dress, and is
acceptable within this society for women to wear men's clothing. However,
it is not quite as acceptable for a man to be wearing women's clothing.
Within this definition of transvestite, also known as cross dresser ,
there are varying degrees of cross dressing.
It is impossible to
estimate the incidence of transvestism. Transvestism is considered a
"hidden phenomenon" because most males let very few, in any, know
about their desire to dress in women's clothing (Brierley, 1979). In fact,
until fairly recently, with the upswing and publicity of social groups for
transvestites, the only way a transvestite became known was if he went for
medical or psychological help or got into trouble with the law while cross
dressed. The studies which provide some indication of the number of
transvestites vary widely depending on the location, time period, and findings.
Benjamin (1977) believes transvestism
actually occurs quite frequently, with estimates of up to one million, while
Ackroyd (1979) suggests that between 1 and 3 per cent of the male population in
Britain show some signs of transvestic urges while Allen (1989) indicates that
in the United States the incidence is 3 to 5 per cent. However, Sagarin
(1965:113) believes that Ackroyd's estimate is "probably fifty or one
hundred times too high." By 1969 when the Beaumont Society, a
self help group for transvestites, was established they had 400 to 500 members
with the memberships that increase steadily each year. Within the United
States, there were very few social organizations prior to 1960 (Doctor, 1988),
when Virginia "Charles" Prince, a biological male who has lived as a
women for many years, started a magazine called Transvestia and the first
"sorority" of what is now known as "Tri Ess" or "The
Society for the Second Self." With every year, the numbers of
organizations and members grow.
In 1992, a journal,
Tapestry, geared towards "all persons interested in cross dressing and
transsexualism" claimed a readership of about 9000. Only 1200-1500 of
Tapestry's readers have a subscription that is mailed to their home or post
office box (per phone call 4/92). Since most males cross dress in private,
many are married, and unable to have cross dressing information sent to their
house, the approximately 7500 extra Tapestry readers must buy the journal from
group meetings or adult bookstores.
Also within Tapestry is a
directory of organizations and services for the transvestite and transsexual
(Tapestry, 1992, Issue 60). Under the heading of non-profit, there are 201
organizations all over the world, which are basically support groups for anyone
interested in cross dressing. Along with the name, address, and phone
number of the group, the nature of the group, and the services offered are
advertised. Services include newsletters, meetings, outings, speakers,
libraries, while some groups also have storage facilities, makeup and dressing
consultations, plus rentals of wigs, clothing, and makeup. Under the
heading Professional, Medical, and Psychological Health Services, 40 advertise
counseling, speech pathology, and support groups. There is also a section
under the heading Computer Bulletin Boards, which advertises 14 bulletin boards
around the country, where individuals can "talk" to others with
similar interest in cross dressing without leaving the comforts and privacy of
their own home. Although, as I indicated prior, it is impossible to tell
how many people actually cross dress, by the amount of groups, bulletin boards
and other services geared towards cross dressing, it is safe to assume that
there are many more than one might think.
History of the Cross Dresser
Although Hirshchfeld was the first to put a
name to cross dressing, it can actually be traced back to the beginning of
recorded history. The ancient Greeks cross dressed on their wedding night.
The bride wore a false beard and her new husband wore women's clothes when they
slept together for the first time as a way of enhancing heterosexual potency (Talamini,
1982) The Greeks also used cross dressing as a way to trap their enemies.
Solon defeated the Megarians by having his soldiers dress as women. The
Megarians were allowed to disembark from their horses because they were thought
to be women and were thus able to slaughter their enemies.
Cross dressing has long been associated
with the stage. In Japan over 400 years ago, women were banned from the
stage because women were not allowed to act in public, so therefore male actors,
called "oyama," were used who specialized in playing female roles
("Transvestism," 1987). Similarly, Shakespearean plays
commonly used men in female roles (Case, 1988), but the Puritans tried to
censure Shakespearean plays by quoting Dueterotomy 22:5: "A woman shall not
wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's
garment for all that do are a abomination unto the Lord thy God."
Although they were not strong enough to abolish the plays entirely, they were
able to keep females off the stage, thus making it necessary for the men to
cross dress in order to play the woman's part (Tannahill, 1982; Ellis &
Abarbanel, 1961).
Cross dressing,
identified as deviant behavior in our society is not universally defined as
deviant. The "hijada" or cross dressers of India have thought
that because they cross dressed they were impotent at birth and some later had
their genitals removed because it was not necessary to keep them. They
believe a man becomes a "hijada" because he receives the "mata's"
or Gods command either in dreams or when one sits in meditation before her image
(Talamini, 1982).
Some societies accept cross gendered
behavior because it is believed that some supernatural event makes people that
way prior to birth or acquired through a mystical force or dream after birth.
One of the most interesting practices in connection with childbirth is know as
"couvade." When a women of the Erukala-Vandu, of Southern India,
feels the first signs of labor, she tells her husband, who puts on her clothes
along with a mark on his forehead similar to the one women wear on theirs. He
then goes to a dimly lit room and lies down to be treated as the mother in
labor. This is to deceive the evil spirits away from the real mother.
This symbolizes the father as being the "second mother" (Talamini,
1982).
transvestites, Transsexuals, & Homosexuals
Very often, when someone
observes a transvestite, they assume he is homosexual and that wearing the
clothing of the opposite sex is a statement to others that he is interested in
"being the woman" in a homosexual relationship (Bogdan, 1974; Informal
discussions with students). Most homosexuals, however, do not dress as
women. Feinbloom (1978) states that few individuals of homosexual identity
wear women's clothing and as Newton (1979:3) points out, most homosexuals never
"do drag," never perform at "drag balls", and actually
prefer masculine men. Homosexuals who do dress in "drag" are
known as "drag queens" and impersonate women for shows or prostitution
(Newton, 1979).
Another often
misunderstood concept is that the transvestite is interested in surgically
changing their sex and becoming a transsexual. Feinbloom (1978:23) states
that transsexuals are very different from transvestites, referring to both pre
and post operative individuals who feel that their biological sex, male or
female, is incongruent with their gender identity, masculine or feminine.
Often times they feel "locked inside" the body of the opposite sex (Bogdan,
1974; Questionnaire Lucy, 1992).
A transvestite, on the
other hand is different from either a transsexual or homosexual according to
Prince (1967), yet Woodhouse (1989) realized that transvestites do not "fit
into neat and tidy compartments" and that there is no " transvestite
type." Most have their first experience of cross dressing occur prior
to age 10 (Bullough, Bullough, & Smith, 1983), and start off by wearing
their mother's or sister's clothing (Prince , 1967). The majority of men who
claim to be transvestites are rated as above average in intelligence and careers
(Prince, 1967; Reinisch, 1990), with most being in professional occupations,
such as managers, scientists, and engineers (Brierley, 1979; Bullough, et al,
1983). Brierley suggests that transvestites take on masculine professions
on one hand that enables them to "slip" into their feminine role,
rather than undertake occupations typical of women, such as beautician and
flower arranger (Whitam & Mathy, 1986).
Almost all cross dressers adopt
female names . Often times the names vary according to social class,
age, and location of the man (Brierley, 1979). Sometimes their male names
are feminized, such as Ken might become Kay or Jim might become Jan.
Brierley (1979:32) states "there is little doubt that the transvestite
choice of name aims to promote an image of extreme femininity - more royal than
the queen!"
The desire to quit cross
dressing is often times very intense. Associated with cross dressing
behavior is many years of quilt, pain, rejection, and loneliness. Often
times during his life, a cross dresser will get rid of all of his clothing and
female items, telling himself he will never do it again (Prince, 1967). No
matter how much money he has invested in his "wardrobe", he will
"purge" by getting rid of it all, only to buy it all back again when
the need to cross dress becomes too profound.
Doctor (1988:189) states that
"intense frustration upon cessation of cross dressing, or in response to
the blockage of cross dressing, has been long recognized." Although,
Doctor did not ask the cross dressers how it feels to stop, he did ask their
wives who report that the men become irritable, moody, unhappy, angry, and tense
when they try to stop.
As a coping mechanism, and a
way of learning more about transvestism, an individual might decide to contact a
transvestite organization. Talamini (1982:38) states that transvestite
organizations "promote adaptation to stigma and exist primarily to furnish
activities for members" while "propelling them into some sort of
public outspokenness, allowing them to divulge a heretofore hidden secret to a
group of like-minded people" (Woodhouse, 1989:37). This supports
Sagarin (1969:21) who believes that people will join, support, and form groups
because: "deviants always seeks to escape his stigma, but he does so by
seeking either (1) to conform to the norms of society, or (2) to change those
norms to include acceptance of his own behavior."
Someone interested in cross dressing
can find out about groups in various ways. Through publications such as
Tapestry or En Femme, or through clothing boutiques that cater to larger sizes,
which often times is a signal to cross dressers that they are catered to and
welcomed and through an "underground" that seems to exist for
all "deviant" groups (Informal discussion with Arizona police quite a
few years ago).
Talamini (1982) suggests that the
"coming out" process is somewhat necessary for the transvestite to
receive the support he needs to live his life. The individual goes from
isolation and concealment to a place where he is able to find role models and
coaches who are able to advise him in all aspects of being a transvestite.
Wives or Significant Others
The majority of
"heterosexual" transvestites state they are married, or have been and
are now divorced, and are parents (Prince, 1967; Brierley, 1979; Doctor, 1988).
Unfortunately, many of the wives of transvestites knew little about transvestism
prior to learning that their husbands were interested in cross dressing (Doctor,
1988). According to Talamini (1982), "the transvestite searches for
an understanding woman who will encourage him, or at least accept his
hobby," yet most wives did not know that their husbands were interested in
cross dressing prior to marriage. Often, the wife finds out accidentally
sometime into the marriage and as a result has a difficult time adjusting
to the cross dressing behavior (Talamini, 1982; Brown & Collier, 1989;
Woodhouse, 1989).
Initially, wives believed
their husbands were "gay", "peculiar", "had a harmless
compulsion", or a "biological problem" (Doctor, 1988:170) and
list transvestism as a significant problem in most of their relationships.
This results in overwhelmingly low self esteem in the wife, (Brown &
Collier, 1989) many fears (Woodhouse, 1989), and/or considering herself
"lucky that a man finds her attractive" regardless of his problems (Feinbloom,
1976:107). Some wives believe their knowledge about their husbands cross
dressing was a "secret" shared between them, that kept their mate from
infidelity, while they denied and sacrificed their personal sense of self worth
to avoid the possibility of separation or divorce (Brown & Collier, 1989).
They worry about others
finding out, and possible harm to the children. This is very similar to
wives who find out their husbands are bisexual (Auerback & Moser, 1987).
In order to keep the marriage intact some women are "acceptors" who
participate in some cross dressing activities and others are "rejectors"
who looked at the behavior with disdain and therefore criticized the cross
dresser (Brown & Collier, 1989). Yet, ultimately they learn that
transvestism is a major part of their mates personality and "to get their
sexual needs met, .... cross dressing is frequently necessry to enable their
mates to function" (Brown & Collier, 1989:81), even though many believe
that cross dressing has a damaging effect on their sex life. Doctor
states: "It is likely that the husband has come to prefer his erotic cross
dressing to the marital sexual relationship. Masturbation while cross
dressed becomes the favored sexual technique, and often, the almost
exclusive sexual outlet" (Doctor, 1988:176).
Doctor states that no
matter how supportive she is, she is often turned off by the cross dressing and
will demand that it not take place in bed (Doctor, 1988). This is what
Doctor (1988:185) calls the "isolation game", where there is a great
deal of denial, an extensive amount of lying, and deception on the part of the
husband, no intimacy, and both partners withdraw from the relationship.
Coping with their mates primping, working with makeup, and the amount of time
spent in front of the mirror has been reported as being both very frustrating
and difficult. Many saw their mates as "self centered,
insensitive and unable to compromise" (Brown & Collier, 1989:82).
The most important source of
information about cross dressing, directed at wives comes from books, magazines,
and the literature of various organizations. Unfortunately, most
literature written for wives is by transvestites. Prince's (1967) book, The
transvestite and His Wife, most commonly referred to wives of transvestites by
their husbands, is a guide for the spouse of a transvestite on how to be the
"perfect wife" for a cross dresser. Prince (1967:39)
believes it is important for wives to support their husbands, to not "let
ignorance, intolerance, and selfishness" come between them otherwise,
"she will loose." Prince uses fear by suggesting to wives
that it is impossible to get a transvestite to stop cross dressing. To try means
to only "drive it underground". Prince (1967:36) continues
throughout the book to say things like "since you married this man and
because you love him, you could hardly wish him to carry a burden of
unhappiness, frustration, and guilt around with him the rest of this life.
You would want to relieve him of those burdens, keep him happy and
healthy". Prince (1967:53) also tells wives to "check your own
emotional inventory to see whether or not your lack of understanding of this
problems is not some measure due to your own load of emotional problems,"
and even goes so far as to put wives on an A-F grading scale.
Sexuality
As previously stated, many
researchers suggest that transvestites are heterosexual (Raynor, 1966; Prince,
1967; Doctor, 1988; Reinisch, 1990), however, Benjamin (Blanchard, 1989:321)
believes that cross dressers are actually heterosexual only as long as they are
in their male role, but often times respond homosexually when they are cross
dressed.
Numerous transvestites deny
that cross dressing has anything to do with sexual feelings. In fact, they
state that they cross dress mainly because of the desire to "be like a
women." Yet, often times, men are ashamed to acknowledge any erotic
or sexual feelings while cross dressing (Doctor, 1988:190). To determine
whether transvestites actually do have sexual feelings, Blanchard at al (1986)
used penile blood volume, as the dependent variable, to determine if erotic
response to cross dressing fantasies could be detected in heterosexual cross
dressers who denied erotic feelings. Results suggest that they do in fact
become aroused and there is a discrepancy between self reports and physical
response.
Many accounts of males who cross dress,
either in anticipation of sex change surgery or just to live full time as a
woman do in fact, have sex with men (Kando, T. 1973; Bogdan, 1974; Fournet,
L. M., Forsyth, C. J., & Schramm, C. T., 1988; Garber, M. 1992).
However, they justify it as not a homosexual act, since they are "a
woman" rather than a man.
Studying Transvestism
Surprisingly little research has actually
been done in the area of transvestism alone. Typically, any discussion of
transvestism in the literature is grouped together with transsexualism, and
homosexuality (Kando, 1973; Bogdan, 1974; Sagarin, 1965; Feinbloom, 1976;
Koranyi, 1980; Whitam & Mathy, 1986; Doctor, 1988). Often times it is
discussed in the psychological or medical literature, within the realm of a
disease that must be diagnosed and cured in some way (Green, 1987).
Virginia "Charles"
Prince (1967) has written at least three books, numerous articles, and is often
cited within scholarly literature. Although "her" views are by
no means objective and research methods quite questionable, "she" does
state four important reasons that are not discussed in the literature about why
someone would cross dress. They are:
1) Men are only able to show "goodness" and "virtue"
while dressed in female clothing
2) Male clothing is rigidly constructed while female clothing is not
3) Relief from the requirements of masculinity
4) Relief from having to live up to male images.
Other researchers (Benjamin, 1966; Brierley, 1979;
Stoller, 1985; Master, Johnson, & Kolodny, 1986; Doctor, 1988) have done
work from a psychological perspective that classifies transvestites
as a "gender identity disorders." Even though all cross
dressing behavior refers to wearing the clothing of the opposite sex, some tend
to categorize (Benjamin, 1966; Doctor, 1988) and define (Whitam, 1986)
transvestism with many variations and stages (Benjamin, 1966; Feinbloom, 1976;
Doctor, 1988). The distinction used by almost all researchers is between
heterosexual and homosexual transvestites, where there is a somewhat
"invisible line" that has been drawn between the sexual preferences of
cross dressers. Similarly, there are different approaches to studying
transvestism between disciplines, where most previous research on the subject of
transvestism can be separated into three distinct groups; Biological/Medical,
Psychological, Sociological. However, for this project I will add a fourth
group, Feminist.
Biological/Medical
The biological/medical approach to
transvestism assumes that there is a hereditary predisposition to cross
dressing. This can be genetic chromosomal anomalies, congenital
maldevelopment, or some kind of postnatal imbalance (Ellis & Abarbanel,
1961; Doctor, 1988). There is little evidence to support this idea, which
seems problematic since it infers that a transvestite instinctively wears the
clothes of the opposite sex.
The transvestic behavior is often times
brought out into the open when there is conflict between with the cross
dresser's parents, spouse, or the law over their desire to cross dress.
With little knowledge about transvestism, the individual is often referred to a
therapist (Reinisch & Beasley, 1990), indicating to them they are flawed and
need to be fixed .
The current Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R) (American Psychiatric
Association, 1987: 288), which is used by health care workers to diagnose
"illness," places transvestism under the section entitled "Sexual
Disorders," in between "Sadism" and "Voyeurism."
The diagnosis criteria is:
" A. Over a period of at least six months, in a heterosexual male,
recurrent intense sexual urges and sexually arousing fantasies involving
cross-dressing.
B. The person has acted on these urges, or is markedly distressed by them.
C. Does not meet the criteria for Gender Identity Disorder of Adolescence or
Adulthood, Non transsexual Type, or Transsexualism"
They add that while cross dressed, the individual usually masturbates and
imagines other males being attracted to him as a woman while in feminine
clothes. The APA states that the diagnosis should be changed to
"Gender Identity Disorder of Adolescence or Adulthood, Non
transsexual" type, if the sexual arousal to the clothing disappears, yet
the cross dressing continues. Otherwise the label of "Transvestic
Fetishism" is attached since the definition of fetishism is the
"repeated, preferred, or exclusive method of achieving sexual excitement
via the use of non-living objects or part objects" (American Psychiatric
Association, 1989).
The Treatment of Psychiatric
Disorders states that there is no single treatment that is effective in treating
the disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 1989:637), yet treatment is
still tried in many cases (Tollison & Adams, 1979: APA, 1989).
Treatments include biologic, psycho dynamic, and behavior therapies, that take a
very long time, often regress and fragment the personality and are usually
unsuccessful (Kando, 1973; APA, 1989), which supports Prince's (1967) belief
that treatment is a waste of time and money.
Psychological
Sigmund Freud, the
founder of psychoanalysis, believed that everything that happens in a child's
life affects and predicts their future as adults. Nothing happens by
chance, and childhood is actually a very traumatic time, during which any
deviation from the "norm" can cause problems for the individual later
on in life.
Some researchers have worked on how
to predict future atypical adult sexual orientation in children (Whitam, 1977;
Whitam, 1980; Green, 1987). Data for the early cross gender behavior of
children comes from 4 main types of research: longitudinal, retrospective,
observational, and reports of parents (Whitam & Mathy, 1986). Usually
parents become concerned when their male child show's what they would consider
"sissy" behavior. The parents become worried that the child will grow
up to be homosexual so they look for a "cure" to prevent this from
happening. Whitam & Mathy (1986:33) state:
"Playing with girl's toys, cross dressing, preference for girls' games and
activities, preference for the company of adults of the opposite sex, and being
regarded as a sissy by others are strong indicator of later atypical sexual
orientation."
Green (1987) studied 66
prepubertal "feminine boys" who showed signs of cross gender behavior
and compared them with a group of 56 boys who matched them in all areas except
they were considered "masculine boys." The greatest
difference between the two groups was the amount of time spent cross dressing.
Feminine boys did not want to do "rough" and "tumble"
games, wanted to be girls, were interested in their mothers clothing, and wanted
to play with dolls. Green attributes this behavior to "feminine
boys" having spent less time with fathers, especially prior to the 5th
birthday, and as a lack of parental intervention early enough to stop the
behavior. Most parents originally thought cross dressing behavior was cute
or funny and considered it to be a passing phase. Green believes that by
ignoring the behavior the children thought it was a positive reaction to cross
dressing and believed that "without parental interruption they (the
children) would tend to consider the parental response as somewhat
accepting" (Green, 1987:65). If the parent had at least attempted to
divert the child to something else or just forbid the child to cross dress it
would have been considered a negative reaction that would suppress it.
Green indicates that therapy at an early age can somehow "cure" the
cross gender urges.
Sociological
Some researchers (Sagarin, 1969;
Kando, 1973; Bogdan, 1974; Feinbloom, 1977; Newton, 1979; King, 1987; Talamini,
1982; Bullough, 1991) have studied transvestism from a sociological approach,
one that does not look for something "wrong" within the
individual either biologically or psychologically. Unfortunately, many
studies are quite old and some have serious flaws.
Sagarin (1969) included transvestites
among other groups of individuals whom he believed were deviant, such as
Alcoholic Anonymous members, gamblers, and dwarfs. His data consisted of
two transvestite journals, minutes to meetings (it is unclear whose meetings),
police reports, and someone else's master's thesis. He had no direct
contact with transvestites as far as I can tell, yet based on his data, Sagarin
stated that previous estimates on the incidence of transvestism was
"probably fifty or one hundred times too high" (Sagarin, 1969:113).
He described the transvestite as someone who "shows scorn for
homosexuals," as a way of affirming his heterosexuality, and stated there
are no formal organizations for transvestites, only journals, because men who
cross dress will not "form organizations or fight for the right to
dress" (Sagarin, 1969:113). Unfortunately, Sagarin contradicts himself in
many places, leaving his work inaccurate, and incomplete.
Kando (1973) was interested in how
transvestites who eventually changed their sex scored on certain tests in
comparison to males and females who were not transvestites. He found that
transvestites scored much more feminine on masculine/feminine scale, attitudes
towards gender norms, and role strain. This suggests that while women do
not actually accept traditional stereotypes of femininity, i.e. the statements
"Women have a greater desire to have children than men" and
Ultimately, a woman should submit to her husband's decisions",
transvestites/transsexuals do. In fact, they seem to become hyperfeminine.
Bogdan's (1974) book is just one more
case history, that gives some insight into the life of one transvestite, Jane
Fry, by letting "her" speak about "herself" and
"her" experiences. The book relates Jane's unhappy life giving
the impression that all the major conflicts in Jane's life are a result of
"her" unacquired desire to be a woman. Jane even goes so far as
to get married, impregnate "her" wife, then flips out, and escapes by
going into the hospital, claiming jealousy over not being able to have a baby.
Bogdan buys into this and tries to explain how mental hospitals misjudge
"deviants", while stating "we can understand sexism.... in it's
grossest form" thanks to Jane's story (Bogdan, 1974:223). I find Bogdan's
conclusions very problematic and see that once again, coming from a white male
perspective, the discussion is focused on Jane, and "her" escape
mechanisms, rather than the desertion of the wife and baby when Jane could not
handle his responsibilities.
Feinbloom (1976) felt
there was no information for the "lay" reader on the subject of
transvestism that wasn't medically or psychologically grounded. In the
70's, she became interested and started attending group meetings to investigate
"the sociology of everyday life" of the cross dresser (Feinbloom,
1976:5), thus resulting in a interesting journalistic account of a transvestite
and transsexual community. An area of interest, the wives of transvestites
was mentioned briefly, yet her conclusions about their participation rests in
Feinbloom's belief that the wives have low self concept of themselves and the
need for a "girl friend."
To find out if transvestism is a
result of an absent father and the lack of interest in typical male activities
as a child as some literature suggests, Bullough, Bullough, & Smith (1983)
studied 65 transvestites and compared them to transsexuals, gay men, and a
control group. Finding suggest that an absent father was no more common
for the transvestite group than the others, which contradicts Green's (1987)
study, and that both the transvestite group and the control group felt sports
were very important as children. The researchers concluded that
transvestites learned quite early how to compensate for their cross dressing
behavior by playing the masculine role well enough to avoid questions by others.
This compensation follows into their adult lives by affording them the
"security of success in the male world," but the ability to escape
into a feminine persona (Bullough et al, 1983:255).
Fournet,
Forsyth, & Schramm (1988) investigated the social processes to see how an
individual manages his "deviant" identity. The researchers found
that homosexual transvestites, heterosexual transvestites, and
non-cross-dressing homosexuals, "attempt to compartmentalize" their
behavior, thus avoiding contact with other groups. This permits each group
to normalize themselves by denying their own stigma while disassociating
themselves from a "negative reference group" (Fournet et al, 1988:181)
whom the public has been conditioned to stereotype negatively. Accounts,
which are excuses and justifications about the behavior in question, protects
self esteem and puts each group into a majority whose "values, abilities,
or performances" are considered superior (Fournet et al, 1988:181).
The need to categorize oneself is interesting, although King (1981) believes it
is a relatively new concept. It wasn't until the late 1950's that Prince
separated the definition of transvestite from both those of the homosexual and
transsexual.
Feminist
Unfortunately very few
researchers have studied transvestism from a feminist approach. Although the
book, Feminism and Theatre, by Case (1988) is not directly about transvestism,
it is certainly applicable to my research and therefore deserves to be
mentioned. Case maintains that while men have had a public life available
to them throughout history, women have traditionally been relegated to a
private, oppressed, and suppressed life. Men played the female role in
plays, which allowed a fictional female to be invented and represented to
society as the "normal women." Case (1988:6) states that there
are two types of female images that were portrayed; "positive roles, which
depict women as independent, intelligent and even heroic; and misogymistic roles
commonly identified as the Bitch, the Witch, the Vamp and the
Virgin/Goddess." She questions how men were able to portray
women on the stage and states:
"Besides wearing the female costume and female mask, he might have
indicated gender through gesture, movement and intonation...however it is
important to remember that the notion of the female is derived from the male
point of view, which remained alien to the female experience and reflected the
perspective of the gendered opposite" (Case, 1988:11).
Ideologies such as the "battle of the sexes," uncontrollable
sexuality, and women's ability to start wars, are seen time and time again as
things women are capable and interested in doing. It is no wonder that men
think they know what "true womanhood" is about.
Woodhouse (1989) states that
"transvestism is a fantasy world, a means of becoming another sort of
person temporarily while retaining one's own identity" (Woodhouse,
1989:52). A transvestite believes in very rigid gender roles, where the
only way he can show any feminine qualities is to be dressed in female clothing.
This fantasy permits some men to live two separate lives, and enable them to do
some things in their female role that they would never do in their male role.
However, "the transvestite simply bends the rules to his own satisfaction,
periodically 'slumming it'(by playing the women), but never relinquishing his
claim to masculinity" (Woodhouse, 1989:88).
Woodhouse takes a serious look at the wives of
transvestites, from a feminist perspective, looking not from their husbands
point of view, but realizing the importance of getting directly to the wives and
letting them speak for themselves. She has found that wives of
transvestites are a very invisible group, often afraid or uncomfortable to
attend transvestite functions, while "overshadowed by the 'other women in
their men's lives" (Woodhouse, 1989:89). The wives are often
isolated, not able to tell anyone else about their situation, and many times
believe that they are to blame for their husbands desire to cross dress. One
women (and I would guess many others that were not interviewed) was so depressed
and stressed she ended up in a psychiatric hospital to treat her problem, rather
than the problem that was inflicted on her by her husband. Due to the economic
situations women have traditionally been in, where they are dependent on their
husbands support, Woodhouse suggests that adjustment to their husbands cross
dressing is often times found to be their only solution.
Finally, the most current writings on
transvestism from a feminist perspective is Vested Interests: Cross Dressing
& Cultural Anxiety (Garber, 1992). Grabber gives an in-depth excellent
exploration of many aspects of transvestism. She looks at costume,
fashion, the arts, medical discourses, movies, and much more. Still,
Garber concludes that even though transvestites take on female names, wear
female clothing, and act as they think women act, "it is clearly not female
subjectivity, it is a man's idea of what a women is; it is male subjectivity in
drag" (Garber, 1992:96).
Hypothesis
As I have stated the goal of this project is to gain
information regarding the construction of sex, gender, and sexuality of self
described male transvestites. I hope to learn to what degree the subjects'
conception of traditional male roles influence their desire to cross dress and
to establish what they feel are negative qualities of one gender and positive of
the other. I hope also to learn how they manage their dual gender
identities on a full time basis. I will explore these objectives by
examining the following relationships.
First, given the rigidity of the self-perceived sex role stereotypes acquired
in males' upbringing, I expect they will have harder time blending those sex
roles. Because of this many will use cross dressing as a way to show the
more feminine traits by cross dressing rather than add feminine qualities to
their masculine identity.
Second, the earlier that a male starts cross dressing, the more likely the
formation of his "deviant" identity goes through more stages, as
outlined by previous researchers in other studies.
Third, after years of cross dressing within the privacy of their own home,
the transvestite will venture towards a transvestite organization which provides
a way of lessening the stigma attached to being a transvestite.
Forth, once a transvestite is established within a social organization and is
able to be around other transvestites, he learns the role and vocabularies
associated with his cross dressing behavior.
Fifth, upon growing up, men learn scripts that tell them heterosexuality is
the "norm" and anything else is unacceptable. Therefore,
transvestites try to conform to those ideas, but find them problematic.
Similarly, they learn new scripts upon associating with other transvestites.
Sixth, transvestites go through similar steps as they take on a deviant
identity, as has been described by others researchers (Becker, 1963; Adler &
Adler, 1983; Levi, 1989; Hong & Duff, 1989).
Chapter 5: Methodology
One of the goals of this project is to
document how transvestites come to understand themselves, look at their
biography, and understand how they present themselves to others while
maintaining a perceived "deviant" identity. Goffman (R & W,
19:105) states: "an important aspect of every career is the view the person
constructs when he looks backward over his progress." In order
to let my subjects look backward and obtain the information about their lives,
it was necessary for me to get directly to the source of this information, the
transvestites themselves. The data collection was accomplished this in
three ways: 1) questionnaire 2) interviews 3) computer bulletin boards. I
will first give a brief description of each source of data.
Although it is impossible to
foresee all possible problems that can arise while working with subjects, I feel
that it is necessary to describe one that did occur. Prior to doing this
project, most of the transvestites I came in contact with seemed to be quite
experienced at telling their stories. However, I could not have
anticipated how traumatic it can be for the person who has never "come
out" to anyone. I met with a subject, who was coming into town for
work, in a restaurant in Santa Barbara. Equipped with a recorder and
notebook, I listened as the man told me about his life, how he needed to keep
transvestism hidden from everyone around him including his wife, and the stress
it was causing him. He was very tearful and told me he was suicidal.
Although, much of the literature states that researchers should be unbiased and
uninvolved with their subjects, I felt I needed to intervene. I believed
that it was unethical for me to have just thanked him for his help and leave
knowing how much stress he was in. I referred him to both a counselor who
dealt in gender issues in his area and also to a support group for
transvestites. I believed that on one hand he needed immediate help in
dealing with his suicidal feelings as a result of isolation and anxiety about
his transvestism, and he needed the opportunity to learn that some transvestites
do manage their lives quite well and who could offer him the support he needed
during this transition . He contacted me later, by letters, to thank
me, tell me he had acted on my suggestions, and was doing much better.
The Questionnaire Data
During the Summer, 1991, I
wrote a letter to 102 organizations advertised in the The TV-TS Tapestry, a
journal for people who are interested in cross dressing and transsexualism.
The organizations in the journal are listed by state, with the name, address,
and the other relevant information about the organization. In my letter I stated
who I was, where I was from, my interest in doing work on transvestism, and
asked the organization to place an ad in their newsletters asking for people
willing to answer a questionnaire to contact me (See Appendix 1). Of the
102 letters, some came back unable to be delivered by the postal service (4),
others responded but said they had no newsletter (3), they were only a store
front (1), out of existence (1), or were for TS only (1). From the
remaining I received correspondences and requests for a questionnaire from 28
organizations.
Once the organization had placed my ad
asking for respondents into their newsletter, the willing subject would write to
me asking for a questionnaire. I would give that subject a number at that
point, in order to ensure confidentiality for their responses and send out a
questionnaire, with a cover letter, and a consent form (See Appendix 2).
Upon receiving the completed questionnaire, I checked it in adding the subjects
number to all parts of the questionnaire, noting how long it took to receive it
back, and added the demographic information of all who replied into a data base
for analysis.
The Interview Data
This was not the major focus of my research
project, but some interviews were done in order to get into a little more detail
than the questionnaire provided. Within the questionnaire, the subjects
were asked if they would be willing to be interviewed by phone and asked for
their phone numbers and best times to call. There was no real method for
how I chose who I would call. However, one thing I looked at was how much
detail they went into on their questionnaire, thinking that the more detail they
went into, the more open they might be on the phone. I also chose
depending on the subjects availability and the part of the country they were in,
which would fit best into my time schedule and theirs. All in all, there
were 9 phone interviews and one face to face interview.
All the subjects that I interviewed
were quite willing to open up and "tell their story." There was
no guidelines that I followed during an interview. I would ask questions
and then asked new ones depending on the interview itself.
The Computer Bulletin Boards
Although there a many computer
bulletin boards geared towards transvestites, I put a questionnaire on only one.
I was not sure how it would work as a way to collect more demographic
information, but thought I would try anyway in order to increase my sample size.
The bulletin board I accessed was
call Fem Net, is listed as "a BBS supporting TV's, TS's, TG's, their
significant others, and those interested in the gendered lifestyles and
transgendered persons. Though not a sexually oriented board, there are no
bounds on the nature of the subjects discussed here..." (Fem Net, 5/92).
I placed a copy of the demographic part of the questionnaire in an ad and asked
people to respond either on the BBS, by Prodigy (another bulletin board), or by
sending their answers to the University address. Although the response was
not overwhelming, I did get some by way of both bulletin boards and see computer
bulletin boards as a feasible way of obtaining data in the future.
The Data
Although data was collected
using three different methods, all three have some inadequacies (Jenness, 1987).
It must be noted that the subjects in this sample do not represent all
transvestites. The subjects that responded to my ads are ones who
are not totally isolated from other transvestites. Although they are
"out of the closet" to quite varied degrees, they are not completely
secluded. They do know that they are not the only ones, they have some
sense of group cohesiveness, even if it is just receiving a newsletter or buying
a journal like Tapestry. This does not however represent the many people
who did not answer my ads from other races, and socio-economic class, who are
possibly very isolated, who manage their transvestite identity in a much more
secluded way, and who we know nothing about. But who are definitely out
there.
Subjects
To date, 6/30/92, I have
received requests from 156 people requesting a survey, with completed
questionnaires from 122 subjects. Subjects represented 28 organizations,
with 29 subjects the most from 1 source. Ages ranged from 20 to 74 years
with most (39%) being in their 40's; 58.2% were married, 21.3% single, and 20.5%
divorced/separated/widowed; 68.03% claimed to have children who ranged from ages
.5 to 43 years old. The majority 92.6% were white; 74.6% claimed to be
heterosexual, .8% homosexual, 18.03% bisexual, and 6.6% were either asexual,
transsexual, not sure, or did not answer. Forty percent state that they
are/were Christian, 29.5% are/were Catholic, 9.8% are/were Jewish, and 20.5%
state they have either no religion or do not answer the question.
Sixty-three percent have completed college or higher, with only 15.6% just
completing high school or less. Sixty-three percent of the subjects
hold professional jobs such as engineers, scientists, and public health
administrators, while 28.7% held non professional jobs such as bookkeepers and
mechanics, and 8.2% were unemployed or students. The mean salary for subjects is
??3 with a median of ??. Sixty-nine percent claimed to have told their
wives or girlfriends of their cross dressing, of those 20.5% react favorably,
34.4% not favorably, 8.2% have some reservations about the subject, and 36.9%
did not answer the question.
The Study
Since the purpose of this study is to
investigate male transvestites in order to understand what parts of masculinity
they reject and how they manage cross dressing with their day to day male roles,
the population used for this study must have some criteria. The men who
actually answered my advertisement for transvestites is a very limited group of
men, yet, within this group there is a vast range of characteristics. Some
never plan on changing their sex, while others can't wait to be able to afford
sex reassignment surgery, and other's cross dress in order to let loose
"the woman inside", while others cross dress for sexual purposes only.
For the purpose of this study it is
unrealistic to analyze all 122 subjects. Therefore, the sample to be
analyzed must fit some required conditions for inclusion in the analysis part of
this study (All are included in the demographic part). The reason for this
selection process is to look at men who are as close to living traditional
masculine lifestyles as possible in order to see how they manage their dual
identities. If an individual states he is homosexual or bisexuality, then
he has already accepted and is managing a different identity for himself.
My desire is to pick a subgroup of men who fit the profile within this group.
Subjects will be included who state in the demographic section of the
questionnaire that they are:
1. heterosexual
2. married
Finally, due to lack of time and the amount of data received, if the
questionnaire was answered by computer or typewriter and therefore able to be
computer scanned or else had been previously transcribed were included also.
The final result is 33 completed questionnaires used for this part of the
analysis.
Chapter 6: Results The Life of a Male transvestite
Sample and Sample Characteristics
To begin the demographics
section of this questionnaire, the first question asked the respondents
where they heard about this project. The 122 subjects whose answers are
represented in this section, represent 28 different sources as shown in Table 1
below. The majority of respondents stated they heard about the project
from Tapestry, a magazine for cross dressers, that most people get from adult
bookstores or other anonymous sources.
Six respondents
originated from a computer bulletin board called Fem Net. This
source was only used for a very short time, about a week, but I believe that if
I had pursued it or other bulletin boards had been tried, the responses would
also have been quite high. Both Tapestry and Fem Net insure
anonymity for the subjects. Unless they wanted to give their names and
home addresses (many did) they didn't have to. This could possibly
substantiate the fact that most respondents found out about this project through
anonymous sources and that transvestism is a "hidden phenomenon."
The second largest group of respondents belong to
various groups or sororities that are under the "mother" group of Tri
Ess,"The Society for the Second Self". Typically, men who
belong to Tri Ess groups have found out they are not alone by seeing
members of Tri Ess on television specials or seeing it advertised. These
men have "come out" to some degree and are learning to live quite
active lives as male cross dressers.
Table 1: Sources of Respondents
| Source and State Club |
Number of Respondents |
| Alpha Chapter-CA |
1 |
| Alpha Zeta-AZ |
1 |
| Androgyny-CA |
1 |
| CDI-PA |
3 |
| Central Illinois Gender Association-IL |
2 |
| Chi Chapter-IL |
4 |
| Chi Delta Mu-NY |
2 |
| Connecticut Outreach Society-CT |
5 |
| Crossdresser Heterosexual Intersocial Club-CA |
8 |
| Jennifer & Friends-NV |
1 |
| Kappa Beta-NC |
1 |
| NY Gender Alliance-NY |
1 |
| Outreach Institute |
1 |
| Phi Epsilon Mu-FL |
6 |
| Phoenix Rising-CA |
2 |
| Phoenix Transgender-NC |
2 |
| Pink Flamingos-MA |
2 |
| Renaissance Education Association-PA |
12 |
| Serenity-Fl |
3 |
| Sigma Chi-CA |
1 |
| Tau Sigma Beta-Fl |
1 |
| The Butterfly-AZ |
2 |
| Tiffany Club-MA |
1 |
| Transgenderists Independence Club-NY |
2 |
| ETVC Information |
8 |
| Tapestry Magazine |
29 |
| Femme Mirror Magazine |
7 |
| Fem Net Computer BB |
6 |
| Unknown |
7 |
The respondents shown also represent 29 different states
as shown in Graph 1. Most (21%) of the respondents are from
California and the next highest (14.8%) are from New York. Although this
was not a direct question on the questionnaire, it is interesting to note that
this sample is more diverse than some of the other studies previously discussed
(Feinbloom, 1976; Doctor, 1988; Brown & Collier, 1989).
Graph 1

Age
As shown in Graph 2, the ages of the subjects in this sample are
between 20-74 years old. The average age is 45.5 years. This is
similar to the subjects in other studies (Prince, 1967; Feinbloom, 1976;
Talamini, 1982).
Graph 2: Age of Respondents
Religion and Race
Although other studies have been done on transvestism,
none have addressed the subject of race. For instance, Talamini (1982)
mentions that his subjects were all Caucasian, yet never mentions why there are
no other races represented. Similar to Talamini's study and as shown in
Graph 3 the majority of subjects in this sample are 93% white, with 40.2%
stating they are Christian, 29.5% Catholic, 14.8% consider themselves not
religious, and 9.8% Jewish.
Graph 3: Religious Preference of Respondents
Education, Occupation, and Income
Most characteristics of the transvestites in this sample are
similar to previous studies done on transvestism, with few exceptions as
can be seen in Graph 4. In Brierley's (1979) study, he states that
13% of his subjects had high school degrees and 37% had college degrees.
The results for this study are similar, 12.30% and 38.52% respectively.
However, data stated in this way does not give the reader the complete picture
about the high socioeconomic status of most transvestites. In this study
all subjects except 15.57% had more than a high school education and 25% state
that they have either a MA or a Ph.D. Similarly, 63.11% of the subjects in
this sample have what I will call professional occupations such as engineers,
and scientists. This corresponds to other researchers (Prince, 1967;
Brierley, 1979; Whitam & Mathy, 1986) who state that cross dressers take on
traditional male jobs. The higher education and occupational choices the
men in this sample have, could possibly account for the fact that the average
income for them is around $40,000 a year, with 29% making over $61,000 a year.
Is it a coincidence that men who choose to answer this questionnaire have good
incomes? Or is it that their good incomes allows them to live the dual
lifestyle of cross dressing. Being a transvestite is not an inexpensive
"hobby." Not only must a man buy his male clothing, he also must
buy his female clothing. This includes breast prosthesis, which can cost
an average of $200.00 a pair, wigs, makeup, hip padding, and as many clothes as
he desires. If one takes into account the amount of time the female
articles are "purged" or thrown out, or the man who is only able to
cross dress when out of town on business and must leave whatever he buys in the
trash prior to going home, it can run into quite a bit of money.
Graph 4: Education, Income, and Employment of Respondents
Family Life
The majority (58.2%) of respondents report that they
are currently married, while others (20.5%) report that they are separated or
divorced as shown in Graph 5. Some explained that cross dressing was the
cause of their marital problems. Respondents stated that they have
been married from .5 - 50 years, with a mean of 17.8 years. Most
(68%)
report having children, whose ages run from newborn to 45 years old. This
is comparable to others studies previously mentioned.
Of the respondents who are married or in a relationship, the
majority (68.9%) of the wives or significant others currently know about
the cross dressing behavior. Few (20.5%) wives respond favorably to their
husbands cross dressing and many did not know their husbands cross dressed prior
to getting married as shown in Graph 6. Many (43%) of the wives either
ignore the cross dressing behavior or tolerate it without any involvement at
all.
Graph 5: Marital Status of Respondents
Graph 6: Wives Attitudes Towards Husbands Cross Dressing
Sexuality
The majority (74.6%) report that they are heterosexual.
This corresponds to other studies (Prince, 1962; Doctor, 1982). Similar to
other research, only 1 (.82%) respondent stated that he was homosexual (Prince,
1962). However, although only few (18%) claim that they are bisexual,
almost half (40.2%) report having sex with someone of the same sex. This
result was significant using a Pearson test F(2, 122) = 15.3357, p = 0.000.
It is interesting to note that of those who do have sex with males, many (26.2%)
of them report being dressed in female clothing at the time as can be seen in
Graph 7. This corresponds to what Benjamin (Blanchard, 1989:321) states
about cross dressers being heterosexual as long as they are in their male role,
but often times respond homosexually when they are in their female attire.
Graph 7: Sexual Orientation of Respondents

Questionnaire Analysis
The second part of this analysis is based on
the answers of 32 respondents. All of them reported they were heterosexual
and currently married. The following analysis will investigate their open
ended answers to see how their idea of masculinity, societal reactions, and
their lifestyles are affected by their desire to cross dress.
Dressing Up
Most respondents remember having had some interest in
women's clothing very early in their lives. Fifty percent recall the first
experience by age 5, 31% by age 10, and 16% by age 15. This is much higher
than Prince's (1962) sample where only 55% began cross dressing prior to age 10.
Only one subject stated that he began cross dressing for the first time at 42
years old.
Often times the first cross dressing experience commenced
after discovering clothing that belonged to a female who was living within the
same household, such as a mother or sister. Clothing, usually
underclothes, was first noticed hanging in the bathroom or in the dirty laundry.
All respondents describe the incredible feeling they had while experimenting
with female clothing for the first times. This feeling is what lures them
to cross dressing and entices then into repeating the act. "Kristen"
explains:
I remember smells, and feeling both how nice the clothes felt against my
skin, and how comfortable I felt wrapping up in them. I would put on a bra
and panties and any other clothes I could find and walk around the basement
pretending I was outside doing something in public and having people looking at
me and commenting on what a pretty girl I was. The only things which were
constant during these experiences were the elation I felt during these episodes.
Similarly, "Rita" states that "she":
saw in the bathroom of my house that my mother had left some stockings up
to dry, and I noticed that they looked so nice & soft looking, that I began
looking at them. Then touching them & wondering why women wore them. Then
after feeling how lovely they felt, I knew I had to try them on, to see how they
would feel on my legs. They were the greatest feeling things (stockings), I had
ever felt in my life.
Playing "dress up" with friends and
relatives or wearing something feminine and cute to a Halloween party is another
way cross dressing originates. "Peggy" was excited about being a
"women" for Halloween, but in order to keep up appearances...
fought the idea because I felt that was what a boy should do. Actually I
was looking forward to wearing the dress. Of course I got teased but had fun
anyway in my dress.
Even at very young ages, some cross dressers have a strong
desire to go outside dressed in women's clothing. "Corinne" wore his
mothers girdle to school in the first grade and remembers the wonderful feelings
derived from the experience. "Mikki Beth" began cross dressing for a
very different reason. His first experience was later than most cross
dressers, at the age of 42, and began, he reported as the result of marital
problems he was having with his wife. Sexual relations were "almost
non-existent" and because of the strong desire to "feel the
closeness" of his wife, he began by holding her clothing next to him while
masturbating. This gradually "increased from holding one item of
clothing to wearing one item, then increased to a "complete wardrobe of
clothing, prosthesis and all."
Recognizing Stigma
Even at a very young age, cross
dressers know that dressing in the clothing of the opposite sex is not
acceptable behavior within this society. Raynor (1966:71) writes
about how a transvestite as a young boy will often wonder and worried if he is
"queer," which they thought was something quite bad. Even prior
to being caught in the act of cross dressing, knowing what they are doing is
considered "wrong" is very apparent. "Michelle" states:
the guilt, shame, and fear I felt afterwards (guilt because I heard my
parents talking about "faggots" who wore women's clothes; shame
because this made me a "faggot" and fear because I knew that if I were
caught I would get put over my mother or father's knee and smacked with a
leather belt. (Note: the belt was their usual form of punishment, and I knew
from prior experiences--for stealing, lying, etc--how painful it was. When I
finally was caught and punished for crossdressing dressing, it was the first
time I actually didn't mind the punishment).
and "Rita":
I would have these terrible guilt feelings about my dressing,
because I knew that (or thought) that the only persons that dressed in drag,
were gay men (female impersonators) that wanted sex with other men, but I was
not gay & that I did not want to attract any men or even talk to them
about my dressing, much less want "any" kind of sex with them, but
I still could "not" understand why I wanted soooo much to dress.
If and when parents and siblings
found out about the cross dressing behavior, most often they did not say much
about it, as was the cases of "Megan", "Peggy" ,
"April", and "Rita". "Megan's" parents
wanted to take him to a therapist, but he refused, while "Peggy"
parent's "made it very clear how I had hurt and disappointed them."
"Joan's" siblings "can't take it at all" and his mother
accepts it as long as she does not have to see him dressed.
"Linda" believes that "if anyone in the family knew, they joined
in a conspiracy of silence" and never brought it up.
"Terry's" mother collected newspaper articles about Christine
Jorgannsen, a famous transsexual, and left the articles where "Terry"
would be sure to find them. But the subject of cross dressing was never
actually discussed. "Kristen's" parent's did take him to therapy and
even sent him to military school with the hopes of "curing" him of
cross dressing. To this day (Kristen is 36), his mother is still trying to
find a "cure." She has even called me for information on
how to go about the "cure" wondering also if her son's cross dressing
would affect her grandson. "Megan" promised his parents he
would stop as soon as he got a girl friend. He did not quit, however.
Society and family
reactions to cross dressing behavior seems to just "add insult to
injury." Boys know at very young ages appropriate gender traits
for males. They also seem to know that in order to cross the gender line
successfully, they must keep their cross dressing a secret from everyone else
around them. To let this secret become known to others, means punishment
and stigma to the cross dresser.
Masculinity
Most respondents agreed on what characteristics
constitutes masculine behavior in this society. These traits range from
"the strong, rugged personality of John Wayne and Rambo, to the good
provider, good husband/father/businessman category of Robert Young in Father
Knows Best" ("Michelle"). "Megan" believes
that at the time of birth "a stamp is placed on our forehead that we are
male. From then on our parents, peers, and society train us in masculine
ways" According the respondents in this study, masculine ways
include sports, dressing in masculine clothing, being physically more muscled
and heavier boned than women, making love in a masculine way by having sex with
a female in a "masculine" (aggressive?) position, providing for a
family, and holding a traditional "male job." "Peggy"
believes that to be masculine, one must:
be an aggressive, take charge type, strong in appearance with no
weaknesses, competitive and able to win at all cost, keeping feelings within,
little or no display of emotions, strong interest in contact sports, having the
right answers, the provider, the defender, display no fear, show no feminine
traits like sensitivity-man do not cry, be physically strong, and avoid the
frilly things. I try to conform to the above.
while "Kristen" says:
I believe that there are many social expectations/attributes that comprise
"masculine" behavior. Among these expectations/attributes are
self-repression of "positive" emotions, non-nurturer (especially
toward other males), self-centeredness, conformance, rather than
individualism, cut-throat competitiveness
"Thalia" sees masculinity as having the same characteristics as most
of the other respondents, except "she" believes that: "Our
society is masculine in orientation and so it is hard to pick out what is
masculine when, in a way, everything is."
Many men in this study state that
they enjoy being male and playing the male role. However, what they hate
is having to be and to act masculine at all times without being allowed to show
any feminine traits. Michelle states "her" dilemma:
I have a very dominant feminine side--my strong points include compassion
for the helpless, nurturing the young, and empathy to the point of feeling
others pain, and other types of "caring" emotions. While I can express
these feelings as a male, I must be very careful not to seem "too caring,
too nurturing, or too empathetic" or else I will draw attention to myself
and subject myself to ridicule. Being a more "feminine male" is, in my
current personal and professional environment, not an acceptable alternative.
"Kristen" states that:
What I dislike about society's definition is the fact that there is a
definition in the first place. Our culture has a propensity toward pigeon holing
everyone in it. If you do not fit in the right hole you become an outcast. I
likewise reject the definition for femininity as it is applied to females. We
miss so much in life by being stereotyped.
Similarly, "Marian" believes that:
Society has dictated how "men" are expected to dress, wear their
hair and act more aggressive. Society's definitions are shallow.
A few of the respondents
noted that they do not like the traditional male attitudes towards women,
believing that women are "2nd rate citizens." They believe that
by being a transvestite, they are more understanding of the problems woman have
to deal with. They see themselves as different then other men who do not
cross dress. "Darlene" noted that "our society is still
quite male oriented in spite of the changes that have been taking place over the
past 20 years or so." "Terry" rejects the traditional
"anger and violence" of masculinity, which "puts women down and
belittles those who are softer in their nature." However, none really
go into detail about issues involving woman in this society.
Considering how
strongly most subjects feel about masculinity, I asked a question about how
cross dressing fits in with their idea of masculinity. I wanted to know
what aspects they were rejecting and how they incorporated transvestism into
their lives. "Carol" idea fairly well summed up what most
respondents stated, that "it is not a rejection of masculinity, just a
fondness for femininity." Many believe that cross dressing is
just one more way to convey the feminine part of their personality, that they
are not usually allowed to express. "Susan H" replies
"crossdressing and masculinity? Like a hand in a shoe, they just
don't fit." And "Lane" says
It's not "written" that it has to fit. When I cross-dress
I give masculinity some time off and indulge in femininity.
And "Stephanie" believes that:
By integrating the masculine and feminine together. you get a
multi-faceted human being.
Many subjects feel that cross dressing "gives them a
break from reality", somewhat like sports, sex, or drugs. "Nancy
Ann" expresses this:
The feminine side takes over, like cruise control on my car. I enjoy
the relief from stresses and demands that are strictly masculine or of the
masculine world. WHAT A RELIEF!
Although none of the literature speaks about transvestism
as a compulsion or an obsession, such as smoking, biting fingernails, or
overeating, the characteristics portrayed by these subjects seem to have some
similarities. This would be worth further investigation.
Becoming a Cross Dresser
With the onset of
so many day time talk shows, such as "Donahue", "Ophra", and
"Sally", all kinds of activities that people might not think about
become more available to society. Many men stated that they found out they
were not the only ones who cross dressed by watching a day time show about cross
dressing. They then have a phone number and address to call, usually of
Tri Ess, where they can find out about clubs, get on mailing lists, and
eventually meet other transvestites who will mentor them if needed. Once
they meet other transvestites, it becomes easier to further delve into cross
dressing.
If the transvestite started
cross dressing as children, then most have spent much of their time cross
dressing while completely alone, in the privacy of their own homes or hotels.
Some have told no one else about their desire to cross dress. Yet, others
have found more freedom and are able to dress in front of their wives, families,
or groups.
Actually dressing in
female attire is an act that gets better with time and exposure to others.
Clothing that might have been used sexual stimulating can emerge into a
full desire to completely "be a woman." The act of cross
dressing sometimes involves a ritual that might take hours to complete.
"Linda" states:
I dress slowly and deliberately, starting with my lingerie. I prefer
stockings to pantyhose, so I have an assortment of garter belts, girdles, and
waist clinchers with garters. I will put on a dress or skirt and blouse and then
a pair of heels. I generally put on mascara and lipstick and some jewelry -
earrings, necklace, ring and bracelets. I then prepare my breakfast. Following
that I often do some work on the computer, pretending that I am a secretary. I
feel comfortable and relaxed, enjoying the feeling and the look of the clothing
on my body.
"Samantha" reflects on how she takes hours to dress up, sometimes
as long as 6. In fact, her wife's main complaint is how long it takes to
change into "Samantha" and how much times she "primps" in
front of the mirror.
Once a cross dresser has
"come out" just dressing up at home is usually not enough. It
becomes important to go out in public somehow. According to Edgerton
(1967) being able to pass in public as normal and to appear to others in society
and to themselves as competent is very important to someone trying to pass.
Some like to go out because it gives them a true feeling of what they believe
being a woman is about. "Samantha" states:
I love all the different senses that I get that are the feelings and
sensations that only a woman would have: Doing what woman do, being
treated like a woman, dressing like a woman, behaving like a woman, etc. When I
go to meetings I have a lot of fun socializing with my friends.
For the more adventurous, meetings and social groups are not
only fun but often times educational. A meeting is a place where a new
cross dresser can go to find role models, others who have been cross dressing
for quite a while, who can teach them all about make up, walking, and where to
buy clothing. For "Suzanne" the first time she went to a group
she says:
I felt peculiar, in that it broke the mental image I had of myself: I had
to accept that fact that I was in a room with men dressed as women. It was like
being in a room with aliens, of which I was one; unaccepted by outsiders, yet
unaccepting of ourselves. Very strange.
"Lane" states:
Being dressed, at a Dodger game or Home-show with hundreds of people or
chatting one-on-one with a stranger while listening to a tinkling piano is
soul-satisfying and sexually satisfying (which can be more subtle than the
required orgasm).
Some respondents talked about their fear of
going out in public while in woman's clothing. The fear for their safety
can still keep some still in seclusion. "Suzanne" states she is
afraid to be noticed by men. She does "not want to deal with either
their desire or their disdain" over "her" cross dressing
behavior. "Peggy" addresses this by saying "it is very
frustrating to be all dressed up and no place to go, but at least it is safe and
I am certainly causing no harm to any one else."
Doctor (1988:12)
states that "passing is highly valued" by the transvestite and
something that he really wants to do. Ackroyd (1979:21) maintains that the
transvestite's need to pass is often to prove how well he can pass as a women.
While some transvestites are able to "pass" quite well, others do not.
They seem to be quite aware of how well they do "pass" and most work
on trying to blend in with society, by wearing age appropriate clothing, and
taking care to put on makeup nicely that will not draw unnecessary attention to
them. "Lane" feels that "passing feels like a
validation, and an acceptance."
Another way to learn how to
"pass" is to watch real women. Women are watched in a number of
places, but mainly grocery stores, and shopping centers. Many cross
dressers such as "Suzanne" watch women in order to "mimic and
copy their gestures." The idea is to act as natural as possible, and
"Samantha" states that the "reaction that you are hoping to get
(while passing) is No Reaction." She continues:
When I am Samantha, I feel like a little child visiting Disney World for
the first time. I am excited, and everything and anything I do is fresh
and new to me. When I "pass" this is kind of like
surviving my first ride through Space Mountain. It's exhilarating and
there is a feeling of accomplishment and fulfillment.
"Joy" feels the same way:
It feels wonderful to pass as a woman, just to have someone think that I
am a woman or to hear someone say "mam" to me is a great turn on.
While some believe they are
able to pass and actually do quite well at it, most realize that due to their
build and their masculine features they cannot pass completely.
"Peggy" thinks she would only "pass at a distance or at
night." Similarly, "Linda" doesn't believe she could pass
even if she "shaved off my beard." Raynor (1966:62) states not
passing is terrible and that "to be read is to be spotted as a man in
woman's clothing. Next to being arrested, it's the worst thing that can happen
to a TV."
Some of the wives are
also fearful of their husbands going out in public while cross dressed.
They fear that they will be mugged, arrested, and/or found out.
"Linda's wife objects to the idea of shaving off his beard for fear he will
go out in public. Other's do shave though. "Stephanie" shaves
her legs, face, and armpits because she hates having hair in those places.
Others use electrolysis to take off any unwanted hair.
What do men who are
transvestites when they are cross dressed and want to be act like "true
women." Most of their emphasis seems to be put on the act of actually
being dressed, the clothing that they are wearing, the finger nails they have
put on, and the wig that they have chosen for the day. At meetings
cross dressers mainly socialize with each other, go out to restaurants, or to
"gay" drag shows or bars where they are normally accepted with little
problems. Often times they sit a meetings, share their stories and
problems and discuss gender related issues as well as who will win a football
game. "Carol" adds:
We mostly engage in conversations, exchange tips on makeup, on what to
wear, and on how to "pass." Generally, the "girls" still
engage mostly in male conversations such as airplanes, sports, and non-
"feminine" topics. They are not effeminate in their actions . They try
to "sit like a lady" and behave as women, but they are men for the
most part. Being with others like ourselves is reassuring to us. I was once
a-said at an RGA meeting, "Do you have a therapist?" My reply
was, "This is my therapy." My wife says I seem relaxed and comfortable
when I am "Carol." I feel contented and at ease when I am fully
dressed and made up as a woman.
Many believe they are more social and less
introverted while dressed as a woman and are able to do things they would not
normally do in their male role. "Betsy" believes that:
Being with other TV's is just great, though; we're all just
"one of the girls", and the non male things we do, of course include
wearing dresses, discussing feminine fashions, hair-do's, make-up, etc. At some
of these meetings, the girls display their culinary prowess. Often we watch
videos of such things as relevant Donahue shows and other presentations nearest
and dearest to us. We're pretty much like any bunch of girls, except that we
don't talk about men!!! (At least not in the same way that real girls
do....)
"Susan H." states:
I love dancing in the feminine role and I go to bars that cater to
lesbians where I can, as much as I'm allowed, to be one of the girls.
Some believe that they are able to touch "other
women" (cross dressers) much more easily when dressed in their feminine
attire. Since many believe that society dictates that men should not touch
one another, except for quick handshakes, transvestite gatherings are a good
time to stray from that rigid role restriction. Although no one suggests
that anything sexual goes on at meetings, the act of touching while talking, or
hugging while greeting are acceptable. "Tina" states that she
can "even dance and socialize with men in clubs when I go out."
It is quite difficult for these men to show other men affection while in their
male role.
All of the respondents stated that they
knew of nothing they could do as a female that they could not do as a male,
except use the ladies restroom. It is interesting to note what aspects of
being a woman cross dressers pick to play out. Referring back to Gagnon
who suggests that transvestites might divide women into two parts; "women's
work" and "sex work", most cross dressers are only picking the
"sex work" as the part of the women they wish to play out. They
want to talk about clothing, hair tips, how to sit, and walk, yet none of them
mentioned that they would love to clean house or do carpools while being a
women. Rather they seem to want a break from masculinity and
responsibility. "Nancy Ann" feels that by cross dressing she can
put away my manhood and take a rest... and the chance to smell pretty and
feel pretty and to act feminine as if it were all that I had to care about.
It would be interesting to learn if cross dressers truly believe women have
no worries and are so totally carefree that they can sit around to discuss make
up tips all day. Is it that cross dressing is truly about being a women or
is cross dressing being used as an escape attempt against the stress of everyday
life (Cohen & Taylor, 1976) Raynor (1966:105) states that the
tensions of everyday life require safety valves, and that one of the most
successful escape mechanisms is total disguise" of cross dressing.
Quitting Strategies
Sometimes the first visit to a therapist occurred
during childhood, when parents become uncomfortable and took their child to a
therapist as soon as any signs of "sissy" behavior were noticed(Green,
1987). However, regardless of when and if they went into therapy,
virtually all of the respondents believed at one time or another that something
was very wrong with their cross dressing behavior. Of the subjects in this
sample, less than half (40%) however have gone into therapy as adults due to the
stress that cross dressing was putting on their lives and the lives of those
close to them. Although Prince (1967) states, that therapy does not work
to change the behavior of cross dressing, it is sometimes necessary in order to
learn to lead somewhat "normal" existence. For instance
"Kristen" says:
Three years ago, I sought out a counselor when I got to the point where
"the closet" and denial were starting to eat at me, and I was on the
verge of committing suicide.
Terry went to a therapist because "she" believed that:
From the time I really started in the attic of my parents' house at age 11
or 12, I was convinced that I was alone and crazy in this
"interest" of mine. I really thought that I was losing my mind ---
that I had two personalities. I have gone to various psychologists and
psychiatrists over the last 7 years.
Finding a good therapist who is knowledgeable in the
area of gender identity issues is very important. When the therapist is
bad and makes the patient feel that they are bad and wrong, it can be quite
damaging, but when the therapist is good, it can be quite helpful to the
transvestite who must learn to manage their day to day lives while cross
dressing without quilt. Kristen explains:
I had about 8 or 9- 1 hour sessions together (with a therapist) that was VERY
therapeutic. He helped me to realize a) that I wasn't alone in this situation (I
believe his exact quote was "you guys all think that you're the only one
who does this!"), b) that being a crossdresser dresser wasn't worth
committing suicide over, and c) that I needed to realize that while
crossdressing dressing is a statistically unusually behavior, I wasn't a freak
for wanting to cross dress .
Most of the therapists "Terry" saw either had "more problems
than we did," "had me listening to cheap tapes" or "were
unwilling and unable" to deal with the cross dressing at all.
"She" finally found a female psychologist who helped her to:
begin to truly love myself and release some of the anger that has followed
me since childhood. We are working on an adventure that is leading me out of the
anger that has been a part of my childhood background. In the process, I love my
female self and can project the good female characteristics even when operating
as a male in my job.
When "Linda" went to therapy with his wife, where they were told
crossdressing is:
not something I can quit. The therapist did tell me to stop wearing
my wife's clothing and to buy my own.
transvestites attempt to terminate crossdressing for
various reasons. Usually due to quilt. Sometimes, it is because they
are going to be married and think that marriage and a relationship will lesson
the desire. Usually the desire becomes more intense the more they try to
abstain from the behavior. Not being able to cross dress can be quite
uncomfortable for the transvestite. "Peggy" says that he
"grew a moustache to make it harder to look feminine" while "Mikki
Beth" explains:
I have repressed it while I try to sort out how it is going to fit
into my life (2-1/2 years now). It is the most miserable time you can imagine.
Chronic depression. Life means nothing, just a game of survival. There is
no emotion in your life. You've lost an integral part of the self. A friend
calls it suicide and murder of the self, and I think he is right. I don't
recommend it to anyone.
Purging, or the act of throwing out all of one's female
clothing in order to quit crossdressing, has been attempted by almost all of the
subjects in my sample. However, purging is not something that works long
term. As "Kristen" states purging might work for a very short
time, but the need to cross dress again takes over.
Purging was always a result of feeling guilty about my desire (actually it
felt like a "NEED", not just a desire) to wear women's clothing, and
to appear as a female. I occasionally felt like I was somehow 'sick' for wanting
to cross dress .I always felt 'antsy' when I was in the middle of a purge cycle
just the same as I do now when I haven't gone out in awhile. I tended to be very
short-tempered during purges, and very depressed (sometimes suicidally
depressed). I would delude myself into thinking that I really wasn't interested
in crossdressing dressing, and that this desire was simply a) an aberration of
my adolescence (hormone storms), and b) a result of being kicked out of the
house and sent off to an all-male boarding school at the time that I was
entering puberty. Within a few months, however, of purging I would 'fall off the
wagon' (to use the AA terminology) and go and buy a slip, or a couple pairs of
panties, or something ... ANYTHING.
"Darlene" states:
In my opinion, "purging" is a futile attempt to
"solve" the problem. In my case I was more determined after each
"purge" and could only look back and say "what a dumb thing to do
and what a waste of money." It is my view that even though you might think
at times that this might be abnormal, the urge and desire to return to this
lifestyle can never be erased, it might be suppressed, but never removed.
"Terry" says "she" purged by burning her clothing.
I did it once in a motel by leaving my feminine things in a motel stairway
in PA. I did it again by burning them in a fit of rage. It helped for a
little while, but before long, I was right back and perhaps at a new level, one
or two notches up from the time before. It was stressful and filled with disgust
when I purged and a resigned "coming home" when I resumed.
Although the subjects in this study enjoy cross
dressing and playing the role of a woman as they interpret that role, they have
no desire to actually change their sex with sex reassignment surgery (SRS).
Of 32 married, heterosexual men in this part of the questionnaire, only 3 (.09%)
stated they would possibly want the surgery sometime in the future. The
possibility most often is dependant on their family life, such as if a spouse
should die and children leaving home. For "Tina" the inability
to be a man as she believes a man should be makes SRS a possibility. She
states:
I am going to try and make it in marriage although my performance as a man
is very poor.
"Megan" says "she" has no active plans to have SRS, but
does "plans to live full time as a woman."
Although "Elizabeth" has no desire to
become a transsexual, she expresses this:
In my Utopia, I would like to be my gender variation in real form, as I
desire. In my Utopia, I would be able to shave my body, pierce my ears, and
dress as I please. Physically, I do daydream about having breasts
(along with the penis). My Utopia would be to able to have a relationship with
my wife (not a male) that was lesbianic more than heterosexual, that I could be
basically a male lesbian or a she-male. The idea/desire for breasts, etc.
do not have anything to do with wanting to be a female, but instead are similar
to the desire to wear female clothing. To me the female body, with its curves
and smoothness is beautiful.,one I wouldn't mind emulating. I hate the
male body, its roughness, squareness, hairiness, etc. It just is not a thing of
beauty to me. Reality is that Utopia does it have a chance in hell in happening
(haha).
What many people do not seem to understand, is the varying
degrees of transsexualism. Similar to gender, transsexualism is also quite
unstable. One might think that to be a transsexual means that one must
have SRS surgery, but does cutting off one's penis, make an individual a woman.
Or does an individual become a woman when they begin taking female hormones,
using electrolysis to remove unwanted hair, take on a female name, or live full
time as a woman. "Kristen" states:
No, I don't plan on seeking reassignment surgery. I know that I am male.
There are times when I just don't like being a male. Reassignment will only
change the "plumbing", and hormones and implants will only give me
breasts - neither will it change what my brain says that I am. The reality
is that even after surgery: a) I would still be 6 feet tall,
b) I would still weigh over 180 pounds (even more on occasion, and even if I
DO carry it well, it still is much more than 95% of most women weigh), c) I
would still wear a size 12 shoe (female size), d) I would still wear a size 18
dress, e) I would still have broader shoulders than most women, even those
who are my height and I would still not be a 'woman', I would just be a male
with enlarged breasts and an artificially created 'birth' canal.
Marriage and Relationships
As stated above, few woman knew that their husbands cross
dressed prior to marriage. Some men believed or were told by others that a
relationship would diminish their desire to cross dress, and that sexuality
within a marriage would take away the sexual urge that sometimes corresponds
with female attire. I have not heard from anyone that the desire to cross
dress ceases at all. In fact, most times in intensifies with the stress
and strain of day to day life.
So, where do the wives fit into cross dressing and how does
it affect the marriage. Many times the wife will not accept the idea
that her husband is a transvestite at all. She either denies the behavior
exists at all or will try to accept it, but "not completely come to terms
with it." "April's" wife found out about the cross
dressing when "she discovered a small bag in the closet with quite a number
of female garments inside. She (the wife) suffered great emotional
shock." "Stephanie" believes that "cross dressing was
the catalyst to the demise" of his first marriage. His first wife
started out supportive, but her tolerance decreased as the relationship
progressed. Often times, wives are hopeful that a good relationship is all
that is necessary for cross dressing to terminate, and become very upset when it
doesn't work. "Jennifer M." states:
Both of us are in therapy to cope with this and the impact on our
relationship. She has tried to participate in outings or meeting but it is
too difficult for her to see Jennifer. She has helped me shop and has gone
to 2 group gatherings, but it is still very difficult for her.
Some wives just leave their home
when their husbands cross dress, thus giving him the time and space to do what
he wants, yet not having to deal with the situation by having to confront it
head on. Other wives really dislike cross dressing and what they believe
it has done to their lives and marriages. "Paula's" wife said
"If I ever see him wearing a dress, I will kill him."
Sometimes the statements given by the
men about their wives reactions to cross dressing is quite confusing. In
one sentence they will state that their wives do not want to see them dressed,
yet in the next they state they sleep in nightgowns and wear panties. Or
that "she does not like it, but will tolerate it for me." It is
difficult to tell about the wives without doing research specifically with them
rather than from their husbands. It might be interesting to find out if
woman who marry cross dressers are a certain type of person, either low on self
esteem, or unable to change the situation within their homes. This might
tie back to patriarchy and the male privilege in that even though a man wants to
be a woman part time, he still runs the home and leaves the wife powerless to
demand any changes.
Although most of the wives just
tolerate their husbands cross dressing, a few actually enjoy it (at least
according to their husbands they do). "Lucy" and "her"
wife were both confused and frustrated about cross dressing until they joined
Tri Ess and "let Lucy out of the closet." Now "Lucy"
believes things are much better.
We have an arrangement which allows me to be Lucy all the time every other
week. As much as she can, Carol helps me shop, advises me on make up, and
takes pictures of me dressed.
It is important to note, that "Lucy's" wife is wheel chair bound
and totally dependent on her spouse. "Carol's" wife also seems
to enjoy cross dressing, yet "Carol" states that she respects her
wife's wishes and is "careful not to steal her husband from her."
Some men, like "Diana" have
given up trying to have a relationship. Due to the existence of
"Diana," "her" relationships felt threatened by cross
dressing, and were even jealous of "Diana's" appearance (She is very
pretty when dressed).
Sexuality
All (n=32) of the married men in this sample state that
they are heterosexual. Some have stated that they are very faithful to their
wives, even though in reality they do have another women in their lives, their
female identity. Several men state that their marriages have gotten much better
because of their cross dressing. "Peggy" believes that her:
personal relationships are better because of my feminine side. There seems
to be more understanding, patience, sensitivity, feelings and emotions. As
stated previously my wife knows of my CD. Have never been fully dressed during
sexual relations. Frequently I will wear some sort of lingerie like panties or a
slip. This does not bother her as it often adds to the excitement and pleasure
for both of us.
However, in reality the majority of wives have
a problem with their husbands cross dressing. "Patricia" states that
she loves her wife, has been faithful to her, but they have been asexual
for over 20 years. "Janice" states that she usually will be
partially dressed in female clothing during sexual relations with her wife, even
though her "wife is somewhat turned off by it and only does it because she
loves and wants to please me." "Cynthia" was only able to
dress one time, during which time his wife masturbated him. However, he
had to offer her $200.00 to do it. "Michelle's wife is not
aware of her true feelings about cross dressing. During sex,
"Michelle" states:
She has no idea that while she is enjoying sex with her husband, that I am
imagining myself as a fairly attractive woman involved with another woman!
(How's that for living with a rare condition? A man who wants to be a
woman is hard enough to deal with, but a man who's driving ambition is to
be a lesbian!)
Often, when the wife does know and is confronted by her
husband in a nightie or panties, she begins to question her own sexuality.
"Kristen" explains:
My wife is concerned about what cross dressing means about her sexuality. She
is concerned that it means that she might, subconsciously, be a lesbian. This is
her expressed reason that she will not participate in sexual relations with me
while I am completely cross dressed. Del is absolutely adamant about this, in
fact, I am not even allowed into bed after a night out until I have gotten
un-"dressed" and have all of my make-up cleaned off. Also, I do not
get any kind of physical affection (hugs, kisses, etc.) from Del while I am
dressed - either before I go out, or after I get home.
"Janyne" states:
My marriage is in a state of conflict regarding the crossdressing. I have
been celibate for over two years now, not by my choice. My wife can't make love
to me just knowing I dress, feeling shaved legs or seeing a painted toe nail
repulses her. I grieve for my marriage and the loss of normal relations.
One aspect of sexuality that seems to be discuss
quite a bit is the position a cross dresser is interested in taking while having
sexual intercourse. Quite a few refer to the female position as being
"on bottom" and the position they wanted to take either in reality or
fantasy. There could be a number of reasons for this, either that they
truly believe that woman are the passive partner who has things done to her
during sex, or that they are escaping from the masculine idea that men need to
be the aggressor at all times. Susan H. says:
My wife is understanding, but a goodly distance from approving. She has a
"hard time" with my crossdressing but does not ask that I give it up.
I have dressed while having sex much to my, but not my wife's, pleasure. She has
tolerated my wearing nightgowns to the point that it seems normal. As I've
allowed Susan to develop my desire to be the pursued and not the pursuer has
gotten much stronger so that now we both (my wife and I) want to be "on the
bottom.
"Tina" does not believe "she" lives up to the idea
masculine lover. She also admits that marriage and sexual relations will
not make cross dressing go away. "She" states:
My relationship with my wife as a companion is very good. My
relationship as a lover is very poor. I am not gay, however I do not have
a strong physical attraction to women. I feel that I am a woman in gender and
therefore it is difficult to perform sexually with a woman. This probably
sounds crazy, but I often feel like a lesbian during sex. I have never
been to bed with a man but I have dated men as a women. My sex was
unknown and I never let the relationship go long enough to lead to anything
sexual. In my relationships it is more satisfying for me to be viewed as a
woman. My wife does not know. It is becoming increasingly difficult
to lead a double life and my 14 months of marriage have been nice but extremely
stressful in that my other self is hidden at home. I made a mistake in not
telling her and quite frankly I'm in a real mess. I guess I had
unrealistic thoughts that marriage might make a man out of me. Please tell
others it doesn't work that way.
Further Thoughts on Sexuality and Relationships
Although I am adding this
section to the results, it does not represent only the 32 men who are married
and heterosexual. What follows is an analysis of the questionnaires from
all of the respondents. Upon analyzing their responses to some of the
questions, I became aware of some issues that seemed to stand out and deserve to
be mentioned.
It is interesting to note that the
majority of men claim that they are heterosexual, yet almost half of them have
had sex with other men, usually while dressed as a women. Many state
that they "fantasize about what it would be like to satisfy a male while
dressed up as a female" (Candi W.) "J.B." and
"Jennifer Anne" state that they are heterosexual, yet have had sex
with a man, but will only do it while "dressed."
"Melissa" would rather be with a woman, but women are unable to accept
"her" cross dressing, so therefore she has sex with men while dressed
which still allows her to considered herself heterosexual. "Terri
Suzanne" says that the only way "she" would have sex with a man
is while dressed, while "Kristen H." states that "she" would
only:
have sex while dressed, he would know, and I would only service him.
The relationship would be a female/male relationship and my male anatomy would
be ignored as a functioning piece of equipment.
Giving oral sex to another man while dressed
is mentioned by a few of the men. They state that it is their fantasy to
have oral sex with a man and see is as a feminine sexual act. According to
"Kristen H." if she was
with a guy, I would never have sex with a guy if I was the male and it's
partly because dressed as a girl, I would be a girl having sex with a guy.
With men it's strictly, I'm the girl and I'll have sex with him as a girl would
have sex with him.
Similarly, while "Francis" makes love with his wife, he is
sometimes
able to convince her to take the superior position, while I take the
inferior position and submitted to her. I enjoy taking the female role.
"Lucy" states
sexual gratification involves masturbation and fantasizing about being
with a man. When my fantasizing involves a man, I pretend a vibrator is
the man. I give it oral sex and then I use it for rectal masturbation.
Others who have had sex with men or are thinking about it,
seem to have some interesting ideas about how females should and do have sexual
relations. They have perceived, inaccurately I must say, about how women
like to have sex. They have this belief that to having sex as a female can
be equated with submission, taking "bottom," and finding
uncontrollable sexual satisfaction in "giving blow jobs." This
seems to be just one more time when men have very different ideas about women
and their real experiences.
This might reflect what Almaguer (1991:84) calls the bisexual
escape hatch which "functions to insure that the tenuous masculinity of
Mexican men is not compromised through the homosexual act; they remain men,
hombres, even though they participate in this sexual behavior." This
might be similar to the men who have sex with other men, but do not consider
themselves homosexual because they are dressed as women. It suggests that
their "escape hatch" from homosexuality.
Similarly, the area of the wives of transvestites was
problematic for me. Other studies (Prince, 1967; Feinbloom, 1976; Talamini,
1982; Brown & Collier, 1989; Woodhouse, 1989) have been done on or about the
wives, yet only one (Woodhouse, 1989) is grounded from a feminist perspective.
In those other studies, the wives were sometimes viewed as "needing a
girlfriend," being the cause of the marital problems, and needing to be
supportive of her transvestite husband in order to keep him happy and the
marriage together. First I must state that I did not interview the wives,
but that everything in my data is a result of the husbands' perceptions and his
answers.
To begin with is many of the subjects stated that being
a transvestite gave them some insight into "what women go through."
They believe that they understand the difficulties women have due to the time it
takes to get dressed, put on makeup, and wear high heels all day. Some
even believe that their transvestism has made them a feminist. It is
unclear what their ideas are regarding feminism, but I did not find in any of
their answers a deep understanding of any real issues regarding women's
oppression or obligations.
One of the questions asked how their wives felt about their
cross dressing behavior, and only 20.5% reported that their wives respond
favorably. However, regardless of how their wives feel, the act still
continues. Many would say their wives hated to see them dressed, yet would
say in another part of the questionnaire that they insist on wearing panties and
a nightgown to bed. They know that their wives do not like to have sexual
relations while he is dressed, but many state that they do it anyway. In
Dobash & Dobash's (1979:31) book on Violence Against Wives, they quote a
fifteenth century translation of the "Knight of La Tour Landry":
"Therefore the wife ought to suffer and let the husband have the word,
and be the master."
It seems that domination and patriarchy is still alive and well within the homes
of married transvestites.
Although there is very little literature about wives of
transvestites and the quality of their lives, there is information about the
wives of bisexual men. One of the main reasons that there is more
information, is that so many more bisexuals have "come out" than
transvestites. Because of this there is more research and more knowledge
available.
There are many similarities between the wives of
transvestites and the wives of bisexual/homosexual men. Many wives were
also not told about their husbands bisexual/homosexual interests prior to
marriage (Brownfain, 1985; Auerback & Moser, 1987; Hays & Samuels, 1989)
either because the man hoped he would quit or be able to hide his secret.
This most often didn't work out. Brownfain (1985:182) states that "in a
world of assumptions about exclusive heterosexuality, the decision to marry is
most often made before one's sexual identity is fully recognized."
Many thought that marriage would keep them monogamous and repress the desire to
partake in bisexual/homosexual activities and that a man cannot actually tell
his wife about himself until he fully knows and understands it himself.
Many wives of bisexual/homosexual men remained in
their marriage because of finances (Gochros, 1985). They become seriously
depressed and have a dramatic loss of self esteem, and "a strong sense of
isolation." When the disclosure had taken place, it transferred
the stigma the husband was holding onto the wife, who was then stigmatized by
whomever they told (Gochros, 1985). Their stigma over the bisexuality or
homosexuality of their husbands left them believing that divorce and counseling
was not an option (Auerback & Moser, 1987).
Many do not have anyone to confide in and have no idea
where to get help or support. The only support groups for the wives
of transvestites are those that are based around the organizations that their
husbands belong to and are mainly to teach the wives how to be "good"
wives of transvestites (Prince, 1967). Studies on the wives of
homosexual/bisexual men found that outside support groups offered support that
enabled wives to deal with the anger, hurt, betrayal, sexuality within their
marriages. and children.
Chapter 7: Discussion and Conclusions
In this analysis, I
have presented data from a questionnaire in which respondents were queried about
their ideas on masculinity and their lifestyles as transvestites. Three
approaches were used to obtain subjects for this study, transvestite
organization newsletters, the journal Tapestry, and a computer bulletin board
called Fem Net. Two parts of the five page questionnaire were used to
obtain information. The first part of the questionnaire was the
demographic section in which 122 subjects were used, and the data were compiled
by the use of a statistical program.
The subjects of this study were a
select sample because 1) the respondents needed to have come into contact with
my advertisements; 2) had to be willing to write to ask for a questionnaire; 3)
have me send one to their address, respond, and return it to me and; 4) they had
to pay for their own mailing. Regardless, the response rate was still
high, with 83% of the subjects who asked for a questionnaire, completing the
process, and returning completed questionnaires. Most sent pictures also.
Secondly, the open ended
questionnaire section was transcribed for 32 subjects who stated that they were
married and heterosexual. I narrowed this project down to those men
because I hoped to see how they managed their lifestyles within their role of
male head of a household and how cross dressing is managed with the rest of
their family obligations. Some of the topics, such as the information
about the wives of transvestites, is only as accurate as the respondents want to
be. I have reported their stories about their lives and how they manage
them as they have reported them to me. Further studies must be done to see
how accurate their interpretations are.
All of the relationships originally
expected were found to be upheld empirically. The men in this study
believe that gender roles are dichotomous and that they have no freedom to
express any traits that they believe are feminine within the confines of their
masculine role. For instance, they discern that men need to be
"macho" and/or "Rambo" types and that to show what they
believe would be feminine emotions or traits would let themselves be labeled as
not "true" men. For transvestites, it is far more easier and
acceptable to show feminine stereotypes while dressed as women than to be seen
by society as less of a man in their male role.
The majority of men in this
study began cross dressing at a very early age. From an early age, they
learned about the scripts that society has governing sex, gender, and sexuality
and that for an individual to deviate from these scripts often leads to
considering oneself deviant. Based on previous studies that show how
"deviants" go through the process of becoming deviant (Becker, 1963;
Adler & Adler, 1983), I believe that transvestites also go through a similar
process' or career paths. All of the subjects in this sample went through
basically the same orderly sequence that Becker's (1963) marijuana users and
Adler & Adler's (1983) drug traffickers went through as they developed their
deviant identity. According to Becker (1963) the individual must first
behave in some way that is considered nonconforming, which for the transvestite
is the act of cross dressing. This act is not consciously motivated, and
most often originates during childhood when they don't yet understand the
implications of what they are doing. In the second step, the behavior is
sporadic and dependent on chance factors such as availability, secrecy, and/or
fear of punishment from family, friends or employer. The transvestite
realizes that he needs to hide his behavior and fears repercussions from his
parents and siblings. The final step in the career often times includes
involvement in an organized deviant group, which is where many transvestites get
a sense of belonging. Finally, similar to Adler & Adler's (1983) drug
traffickers, many transvestites oscillate in and out of cross dressing by
purging their female apparel, yet few, if any are successful in leaving the
activity.
After years of cross dressing
within the privacy of their own home, the transvestite often ventures towards an
transvestite organization or subculture, which provides a way of lessening the
stigma attached to being a transvestite (Kitsuse, 1962; Becker, 1963; Laws &
Schwartz, 1977; Michener, DeLamater, Schwartz, & Merton, 1990).
People within a transvestite group have their "deviant" activity in
common which is often beneficial and stigma reducing while increasing their
opportunity to interact with others (Laws & Schwartz, 1977). This has
a powerful impact upon a transvestite while lessening his sense of loneliness
and isolation.
Once a transvestite is established
within a social organization and is able to be around other transvestites, he
learns the role and vocabularies associated with cross dressing behavior or the
scripts (Gagnon & Simon, 1973; Laws & Schwartz, 1977; Simon and
Gagnon, 1984). He finds other "sorority sisters" who can
instruct him on ways to do makeup, dress, and deal with family and friends.
A group also provides opportunities for cross dressers to go out to restaurants
and even the theater, within the safe confines of a group of transvestites.
Brierley (1979) states
that transvestism is a "hidden phenomenon." I believe he is
correct; it is. There is no way of knowing how many men cross dress, but there
is reason to believe the behavior is more common than one might think.
Keeping in mind there are various degrees in which one can cross dress, this
study is only reaching a select few. There are many cross dressers who are
impossible to reach.
However, within this project the subjects
are quite varied. They are not from one group, but from many.
Subjects who participated in this project are from all over the United States
and even one outside the US. Some are very experienced at managing their
lives as cross dressers, while others are still very much "still in the
closet."
The various sources used to
obtain subjects and the anonymity that was offered to the respondents through
questionnaires and computer bulletin boards, has led to some new respondent
participation in this project. Previous research typically had an easy to
reach sample that might have particpated in other studies. Traditionally
researchers have obtained their subjects and data from medical clinics, when the
cross dresser has come for help (Green, 1987; Doctor, 1988). Virginia
Prince (1967) had a large sample of transvestites through "her"
activities within transvestite organization, while Feinbloom (1976) and
Woodhouse (1989) went to transvestite groups and clubs, where they met with
subjects. While those projects are good, the downfall is that people
within a group tend to be very familiar with one another and their histories.
They have rehearsed their stories, spoken to, and spent time with one another.
Many of the findings in this study
are similar to previous studies, including age, education, marital status, and
race. However, there are some things that need to be expounded upon about
these results. Unfortunately, this study and most others have little, if
anything, to reveal about race other than Caucasians. Only 7.4% of the
subjects in this sample were people of color. Does this indicate to us
that people who are not white do not participate in cross dressing behavior?
I don't believe so. I think that based on the higher than average economic
and educational status of the subjects in this sample, that I was only able to
reach subjects who have the opportunity to come into contact with newsletters,
journals, and computer bulliten boards. But I don't believe that only Caucasions
are cross dressing. Studies need to be done to investigate why minority
cross dressers are depicted in movies like "Paris is Burning" as
homosexual drag queens, while Causcasions do not. I would think that it
has more to do with the even stricter guidelines that govern sex, gender, and
sexuality for minority men.
When starting this study I was given
encouragement and thanks from many of my respondents for taking on such a
project. They wanted information about themselves and their lives to be
made public that would represent them as "just everyday people, who desire
to cross dress." I take their faith my work and their trust in what I
am trying to do quite seriously and have tried to represent them accurately to
the best of my ability. However, some of the data became problematic for
me and I have struggled with how to handle both the information about the
respondents sexuality and their wives. I sense that they are not going to
like what I have to say, and I fear some will feel betrayed. However,
I have a responsibility to describe all my findings and while looking at
the data from a feminist perspective, which is quite different from most other
studies, I believe my ideas need to be addressed here.
Referring back to Gagnon's
(personal interview 5/92) discussion about women being divided into
"women's work" and "sex work", I find it very interesting to
note that virtually all of the men in this sample did not have a clear idea of
what being a women really involves. Some stated that it gave them insight
into women's problems and issues, yet those issues seem to be "how long it
takes women to get dressed and put on makeup." Not one mentioned real
issues that women deal with such as dual jobs, caretaking, domestic work, and
sexual work within a relationship. Similarly, they did not mention how
powerless women are in many cases over their own lives and what takes place
within them. They seem to be very interested in how being a transvestite
affects them, but not how it affects the person they were living with who might
not like the cross dressing behavior, yet was unable to stop it and was
encouraged, many times unwillingly, to participate it in.
Very few men in this study wanted to
change their sex. In fact, most were quite adamant in answering
"NO!", they would not change their sex. I believe that it
is because they really don't want to be a women. Although they like
"playing" at being a women, there is a part of them that realizes that
being a woman, means not being a man. They realize that to cut off
their penis means to cut off their power, which they won't do.
Chapter 8: ReferencesAckroyd, P.
1979. Dressing Up: Transvestism and Drag The History of an Obsession.
Simon and Schuster: New York.
Adler, P. & Alder, P. 1983. "Shifts and Oscillations in Deviant
Careers: The Case of Upper-Level Drug Dealers and
Smugglers." Social Problems, 31 (2),
195-207.
Allen, M. P. 1989. Transformations: Cross dressers and Those Who Love Them.
E.P Dutton: New York.
Almaguer, T. 1991. "Chicano Men: A Cartography of Homosexual Identity and
Behavior." Differences: A Journal of Feminist
Cultural Studies, 3(2),75-100.
Auerback, S. & Moser, C. 1987. "Groups for the Wives of Gay and
Bisexual Men." Social Work, 32 (4), 321-325.
Baldwin, J. D. & Baldwin, J. I. 1989. "The Socialization of
Homosexuality and Heterosexuality in a Non-Western Society".
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18 (1) 13-29.
Becker, H. S. 1963. Outsiders Studies in the Sociology of
Deviance. The Free Press; New York.
Benjamin, H. 1966. The transsexual phenomenon. Julian Press:New York.
Black, D. 1970. "Production of Crime Rates." American
Sociological Review, 35, 733-748.
Blanchard, R., Racansky, I.G., & Steiner, B.W. 1986. "Phallometric
Detection of Fetishistic Arousal in Heterosexual Male
Cross-Dressers". The Journal of Sex Research,
22(4), 452-462.
Bogdan, R. 1974. Being Different: The Autobiography of Jane Fry. J Wiley
& Sons: New York.
Bradley, S. J., Blanchard, R., Coates, S., Green, R., Levine, S. B., Meyer-Bahlburg,
H.F., Pauly, I.B, & Zucker, K. J. 1991.
"Interim Report of the DSM-IV Subcommittee on Gender
Identity Disorders". Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20 (4),
333-343.
Brierley, H. 1979. Transvestism: A handbook with case studies for
psychologist, psychiatrists, and counselors. Pergamon
Press: Oxford.
Brown, G. R., & Collier, L. 1989. " transvestites Women Revisited:
A Nonpatient Sample". Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18
(1), 73-83.
Brownfain, J. J. 1985. "A Study of the Married Bisexual Male: Paradox
and Resolution." Journal of Homosexuality, 11 (1-2), 173-188.
Bullough, V. L 1988. "Women Married to transvestites: Problems and
Adjustments." Journal of Psychology and Human
Sexuality, 1 (2), 83-104.
Bullough, V., Bullough, B., & Smith, R. 1983. "A Comparatve Study
of Male transvestites, Male to Female Transsexuals,
and Male Homosexuals." The Journal of Sex Research,
19 (3), 238-257.
Bullough, V. L. & Weinber, T. S. 1988.. "Women Married to
transvestites: Probelms and Adjustments." Journal of
Psychology & Human Sexuality, 1(2), 83-104.
Case, S. E. 1988. Feminism and Theatre. Methuen: New York.
Chodorow, N. 1989. Feminism and psychoanalytic theory. Yale University
Press: .
Cloward, R. A. & Ohlin, L. E. 1960. "Illegitimate Means and Delinquent
Subcultures." Delinquency and Opportunity: A
Theory of Delinquent Gangs. The Free Press:.
Conrad, P. 1975. "The Medicalization of Deviance in American
Culture". Social Problems, 33(6), 12-21.
Cooper, M. 1990. "Rejecting "Femininity: Some Research notes Gender
Identity Development in Lesbians." Deviant
Behavior, 11, 371-380.
Coveney, L., Jackson, M., Jeffreys, S., Kay, L., & Mahony, P. 1984.
The Sexuality Papers. Hutchinson: London.
de Savitsch, E. 1958. Homosexuality, Transvestism, and Change of Sex.
William Heinemann Medical Books LTD: London.
Dekker, R. M. & van de Pol, L. C. 1989. The Tradition of Female
Transvestism in Early Modern Europe. Macmillan Press:
London.
Dobash, R. E. & Dobash, R. 1979. Violence Against Wives: A Case Against
Patriarchy. The Free Press: New York.
Doctor, R.F. 1988. transvestites and Transsexuals:Toward a Theory of
Cross-Gender Behavior. Plenum Press: New York.
Douglas, M. 1970. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and
Taboo. Praeger: New York.
Douthitt, R. A. 1989. "The Division of Labor Within the Home: Have
Gender Roles Changed?" Sex Roles, 20 (11/12),
693-704.
Durkheim, E. 19 . The Rules of Sociological Method.
University of Chicago Press: Illinois.
Edgerton, R. B. 1967. The Cloak of Competence: Stigma in the Lives of the
Mentally Retarded, University of California Press:
Berkeley.
Edwards, A. 1989. "The Sex/Gender Distinction: Has it Outlived its
Usefulness?" Australian Feminist Studies, 10, 1-22.
Ehrenreich, B. 1990. "Life without Father: Reconsidering Socialist-Feminist
Theory." Women, Class, and the Feminist
Imagination, edited K. V. Hansen & I. J. Philipson.
Temple University Press: Philadelphia.
Ellis, H. 1928. Studies in the Psychology of Sex (Vol II). Random
House: New York.
Ellis, A. & Abarbanel, A. 1961. The Encyclopedia of Sexual Behavior.
Hawthorn Books, Inc.: New York.
Erikson, K. T. 1975. "On the Sociology of Deviance" Theories of
Deviance, edited by S. H. Traub & C. B. Little, F. E.
Peacock: Illinois.
Feinbloom, D. H. 1976. transvestites and Transsexuals, Mixed Views.
Delacorte Press: Los Angeles.
Felstiner, M. L. 1980. "Seeing the Second Sex Through the Second
Wave." Feminist Studies, 6 (2), 247-275.
Fergunson, A. 1989. Blood at the Root: Motherhood, Sexuality and Male
Dominance. Pandora: London.
Fourenet, L. M., Forsyth, C. J., & Schramm, C. T. 1988. "The Process of
Deviance Designation: The Case of the
Homosexual transvestite." Free Inquiry in Creative
Socioology, 16(2), 177-185.
Freud, S. 1962, Femininity. James Strachey (ed.) Basic Books: New York.
Gagnon, J. H. & Simon, W. 1973. Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of
Human Sexuality. Aldine Publishing Company:
Chicago.
Gagnon, J. H. & Simon, W. 1973. Sexual Deviance. Harper & Row:
New York.
Gagnon, J. H. & Simon, W. 1970. The Sexual Scene. Aldine Publishing
Company: USA.
Garber, M. 1992. Vested Interests: Cross Dressing & Cultural Anxiety.
Routledge: New York.
Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Inc.: New
Jersey.
Gatens, M. 1989. "Woman and Her Double(s): Sex, Gender and Ethics."
Australian Feminist Studies, 10, 33-47.
Gibbs, J. P. 1989. "Conceptions of Deviant Behavior: The Old and the
New." Deviant Behavior: A Text Reader in the
Sociology of Deviance (3nd ed) edited by D. H. Kelly,
St. Martin's Press: New York.
Gochros, J. S. 1985. "Wives' reactions to Learning That Their Husbands are
Bisexual." Journal of Homosexuality, 11 (1-2),
101-113.
Goffman, E. 1989. "The Moral Career of the Mental Patient."
Deviant Behavior: A Text Reader in the Sociology of
Deviance (3nd ed) edited by D. H. Kelly, St. Martin's
Press: New York.
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Doubleday: New York.
Green, R. 1987. The "Sissy Boy Syndrome" and the Development of
Homosexuality. Yale University Press: London.
Gochros, J. S. 1985. When Husbands Come Out of the Closet. Haworth
Press: New York.
Gusfield, J. R. 1967. "Moral Passage: The Symbolic Process of Public
Designations of Deviance." Social Problems, 15 (2),
182-185.
Hansen, K. 1991. "Helped put in a Quilt: Men's work and Male Intimacy
in Nineteenth-Century New England." The Social
Construction of Gender, edited by J. Lorber & S.
Farrell. Sage Publications: London.
Hays, D. & Samuels, A. 1989. "Heterosexual Women's Perceptions of Their
Marriages to Bisexual or Homosexual Men."
Journal of Homosexuality, 18 (1-2), 81-100.
Hilton, J. M. & Haldeman, V. A. 1991. "Gender differences in the
Performance o Household Tasks by Adults and Children in
Single-Parent and Two-Parent, Two-Earner Families." Journal
of Family Issues, 12 (1), 114-130.
Jeness, V. 1987. Its All a State of Mind: Social Categories,
Constructed Conceptions, & Lesbian Identities. Unpublished
master's thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
Kando, T. 1973. Sex Change: the Achievement of Gender Identity Among
Feminized Transsexuals. Charles C Thomas:
Illinois.
Kaufman, M, 1987. Beyond Patriarchy, Essays by men, on pleasure, power, and
change. Oxford University Press: Toronto.
Kessler, S. J. 1990. "The Medical Construction of Gender: Case Management
of Intersexed Infants." Signs: Journal of
Women in Culture and Society, 16 (11), 3-26.
Kessler, S. J. & McKenna, W. 1978. Gender: An Ethnomethodological
Approach. Wiley & Sons: New York.
Kimmel, M. S. & Messner, M. A. 1992. Men's Lives.
Macmillan: New York.
King, D. 1981. "Gender Confusions: Psycholgical and Psychiatric Conceptions
of Transvestism and Transsexualism."
edited by K. Plummer, The Making of the Modern Homosexual.
Barnes & Noble: New Jersey.
Kitsuse, J. I. & Cicourel, A. V. 1963. "A Note on the Uses of Official
Statistics." Social Problems, 11, 131-139.
Kitsuse, J. I. 1962. "Societal Reaction to Deviant Behavior: Problems of
Theory and Method," Social Problems, 9(3),
247-356.
Klapp, O. E. 1987. "Dynamics of Self Typing." Deviance,
The Interactionist perspective: text and readings in the Sociology
of Deviance. (5th edition) edited by E. Rubington
& M. S. Weinberg, Macmillan: New York.
Koranyi, E. K. 1980. Transsexuality in the Male: The spectrum of Gender
Dysphoria. Charles C. Thomas Publisher: Illinois.
Laws, J. L. & Schwartz, P. 1977. Sexual Scripts: The Social
Construction of Female Sexuality. United Press of America:
Washington, DC.
Lee, R. & Daly, R. 1987. "Man's domination and woman's oppression: The
question of origins." In Beyond Patriarchy:
Essays by Men on Pleasure, Power, and Change. edited
by M. Kaufman, Oxford University Press: Toronto.
Lemert, E. M. 1987. "The Check Forger and His Identity" Deviance,
The Interactionist perspective: text and readings in the
Sociology of Deviance. (5th edition) edited by E.
Rubington & M. S. Weinberg, Macmillan: New York.
Lemert, E. M. 1975. "Primary and Secondary Deviation" in Theories
of Deviance, edited by S. H. Traub & C. B. Little, F. E.
Peacock: Illinois.
Lemert, E. M. 1981. "Issues in the Study of Deviance." The
Sociological Quarterly, 22, 285-305.
Levi, K. 1989. "Becoming a Hit Man: Neutralization in a Very Deviant
Career." Theories of Deviance, edited by S. H. Traub
& C. B. Little, F. E. Peacock: Illinois.
Lorber, J. & Farrell, S. 1991. The Social Construction of Gender.
Sage Publications: London.
Marlow, K. 1964. Mr. Madam: Confessions of a Male Madam. Sherbourne
Press: Los Angles.
Masters, W. H., Johnson, V. E., & Kolodny, R. C. 1986. Masters and
Johnson on Sex and Human Loving. Little,
Brown and Company: Boston.
Matteson, D. R. 1985. "Bisexual Men in Marriage: Is a Positive Homosexual
Identity and Stable Marriage Possible?"
Messner, M. 1991. "Masculinities and Athletic Careers." The
Social Construction of Gender, edited by J. Lorber & S.
Farrell. Sage Publications: London.
Michener, H. A., DeLamater, J. D., Schwartz, S. H., & Merton, R. K. 1990. Social
Psychology (2nd edition), Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich: San Diego.
Millman, M. & Kanter, R. M. 1975. "She did It all for Love:
A Feminist View of the Sociology of Deviance" in
Another Voice: Feminist perspectives on Social Life and
Social Science edited by M. Millman & R. Moss-Kanter,
Anchor Press: New York.
Nanda, S. 1990. Neither Man Nor Woman: The Hijras of India. Wadsworth
Publishing Company: California.
Newton, E. 1979. Mother Camp: Female Impersonators in America. University
of Chicago Press: London.
Newton, E. 1988. "Of Yams, Grinders, & Gays: The Anthropology of
Homosexuality." Outlook, 1(1), 29-37.
Pfohl, S. J. 19. "The Discovery of Child Abuse" 40-51.
Plummer, K. 1981. The Making of the Modern Homosexual. Barnes &
Noble: New Jersey.
Prince, V. C. 1967. The transvestite and His Wife Chevalier
Publications: Los Angeles.
Raynor, D. G. 1966. A Year Among The Girls. Lyle Stuart Inc.: New York.
Reinisch, J. M & Beasley, R. 1990. The Kinsey Institute New Report
on Sex: What you must know to be Sexually Literat
. St. Martin's Press: New York
Rich, A. 1983. "Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence."
Powers of Desire, edited by A. Snitow, C.
Stansell, & S. Thompson. Monthly Review Press: New York.
Rosen, I. 1979. Sexual Deviation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Rubin, G. 1990. "The Traffic in Women." Women, Class, and the
Feminist Imagination, edited K. V. Hansen & I. J. Philipson.
Temple University Press: Philadelphia.
Sagarin, E. 1969. Odd Man In. Quadrangle Books: Chicago.
Schur, E. M. 1984. Labeling Women Deviant: Gender, Stigma, and Social Control,
Temple University Press: Philadelphia.
Simon, W. & Gagnon, J. H. 1984. "Sexual Scripts." Society,
(Nov/Dec), 53-60.
Simson, R. 1983. "The Afro-American Female: the Historical Context of
the Construction of Sexual Identity." edited by A.
Snitow, C. Stansell, & S. Thompson. Monthly Review Press:
New York.
Spelman, E. V. 1988. "Simone de Beauvoir and Women: Just Who Does She Think
We Is?" Inessential Women, Press:
Boston.
Stoller, R. 1975. Sex and Gender. Jason Aronson: New York.
Stoller, R. 1985. Presentations of Gender. Yale University Press:London.
Sutherland, E. H. & Cressey, D. R. 1975. "The Theory
of Differential Association." Theories of Deviance. edited by
S. H.
Traub & C. B. Little, F.E. Peacock: Illinois.
Talamini, J. T. 1982. Boys Will Be Girls: The Hidden World of the
Heterosexual Male transvestite. University Press of
America, Inc.: Washington, D.C.
Talamini, J. T. 1982. " transvestites as a Minority Group." International
Review of History and Political Science, 19 (2), 1-11.
Talamini, J.T. 1982. " transvestites: Deviant or Minority?" International
Review of History and Political Science, 19 (1),
50-67.
Tannenbaum, F. 19 . "The Dramatization of Evil." Theories of
Deviance, edited by S. H. Traub & C. B. Little, F. E. Peacock:
Illinois.
Thio, A. 1992. Sociology: An Introduction. Harpers Collins: New York.
Thompson, D. 1989. "The Sex/Gender Distinction: A Reconsideration."
Australian Feminist Studies, 10, 23-31.
Tollison, C. D. & Adams, H. E. 1979. Sexual Disorders: Treatment, Theory,
and Research. Gardner Press, Inc.: New York.
Tronto, J. C. 1987. "Beyond gender difference to a Theory of Care." Signs:
Journal of Women in Culture and Society,
12 (4), 644-663.
Vance, C. 1989. "Social Construction Theory: Problems in the History of
Sexuality." Homosexuality, Which Homosexuality?
edited by H. Van Kooken Niekerle & T. van der Geer, An
Dekker, Amsterdam.
Weeks, J. 1986. "The Invention of Sexuality." Sexuality.
Tavistock: New York.
West, C. & Zimmerman, D. 1991. "Doing Gender." The Social
Construction of Gender, edited by J. Lorber & S. Farrell.
Sage Publications: London.
Whitam, F. L. & Mathy, R. M. 1986. Male Homosexuality in four
Societies. Praeger Special Studies: New York.
Williams, W. L. 1986. The Spirit and the Flesh: Sexual diversity in American
Indian Culture. Beacon Press: Boston.
Woodhouse, A. 1989. Fantastic Women: Sex, Gender, and Transvestism.
Macmillan: London.
Wysocki, D. K. 1992. "Construction of Masculinity." Thresholds:
Viewing Culture, 6, 16-25.
Contact Information
Diane Kholos Wysocki, Ph.D.
Department of Sociology
University of Nebraska at Kearney
Kearney, NE 68849-1295
wysockid@unk.edu
This page last updated on April 15, 1998.
Copyright © 1996 Netscape Communications Corporation.
|