|
|
|
COVERING By Diane FRANK I’d like to introduce my gentle and not-so-gentle readers to a new term and use it to broaden a few horizons. Everyone knows the term “passing.” The term started, to my knowledge with light-skinned Negroes “passing” as white. The term has been taken up in the various gender communities to mean being taken as the opposite sex of what’s between (or was originally between) your legs. There are levels of passing of course. For some people passing is simply taking a walk and not having someone yell, “It’s a guy in a dress.” At the opposite extreme, you have “stealth” transsexuals who may well enter committed relationships with partners who have no clue about their past life. This goes in both directions, by the way as I’ve heard of this happening with both FTM and MTF. The new term I’d like to introduce is “covering.” This showed up in an article in the New York Times by the gay Asian-American lawyer Kenji Yoshino back in January, although the term has origins dating back to the 60’s:
Then I found my word, in the sociologist Erving
Goffman's book “Stigma.” Written in 1963, the book describes how various
groups -- including the disabled, the elderly and the obese -- manage their
“spoiled” identities. After discussing passing, Goffman observes
“persons who are ready to admit possession of a stigma...may nonetheless
make a great effort to keep the stigma from looming large.” He calls this
behavior covering. He distinguishes passing from covering by noting that
passing pertains to the visibility of a characteristic, while covering
pertains to its obtrusiveness. He relates how F.D.R. stationed himself behind
a desk before his advisers came in for meetings. Roosevelt was not passing,
since everyone knew he used a wheelchair. He was covering, playing down his
disability so people would focus on his more conventionally presidential
qualities. I find myself covering or not covering and experiencing the reactions in all kinds of things, knowing too much about women’s fashions and makeup for example. I was at a party once, and joined a conversation of a group of women about the local dance scene, something I’m well versed in. They were clearly taken aback that I was participating. And then knowing clothing lines, stores, sizes oh my. Not covering, pretending I don’t know causes amusing situations. I’m sure we can all think of times when we covered or didn’t cover and how it provided amusing or uncomfortable situations. But that’s not what I really wanted to write about. Having just got back from India, I’m doting on my new saris and did some research about them. I discovered that there are hundreds of ways to wrap a sari, but the predominant style in India now is called the “Nevi.” What is fascinating about this, is that village, regional and caste styles of wearing sarees are being abandoned as being identifying. Wearing a sari wrapped Nevi style is a great social equalizer. It is, in other words, covering with a covering. Thinking about what else I’m writing for the newsletter, there is a great lesson in the article that we should bear in mind as we consider people’s reaction to us:
The new civil rights begin with the observation
that everyone covers. When I lecture on covering, I often encounter what I
think of as the “angry straight white man'' reaction. A member of the
audience, almost invariably a white man, almost invariably angry, denies that
covering is a civil rights issue. Why shouldn't racial minorities or women or
gays have to cover? These groups should receive legal protection against
discrimination for things they cannot help. But why should they receive
protection for behaviors within their control -- wearing cornrows, acting
“feminine” or flaunting their sexuality? After all, the questioner says, I
have to cover all the time. I have to mute my depression, or my obesity, or my
alcoholism, or my shyness, or my working-class background or my nameless
anomie. I, too, am one of the mass of men leading lives of quiet desperation.
Why should legally protected groups have a right to self-expression I do not?
Why should my struggle for an authentic self matter less? I’d like to think that in India someday, those modes of wrapping sarees will be reclaimed in a society that won’t stigmatize a woman for the association a particular style suggests. And I’d recommend keeping the idea of “expression of their full humanity” in mind when we try to educate others about our lives. |